Trump transition official in email: Russia 'has just thrown the U.S.A election' to Trump

I could care less for your credibility points, fact is that these emails exist and they were reported, if Washington Times and Breitbart reported factual stuff, I don't mind quoting them either but they rarely do. They are too busy making up another immigrant or Muslim story to rile up their dumb racist base.
Let me take a stab here:
1. Everyone you socialize with has the same political leaning as you.
2. In October 2016 you were at a least one event where everyone was congratulating each other that Hil was going to win in a landslide.
3. You live on one of the coasts.
How did I do ?
 
Let me take a stab here:
1. Everyone you socialize with has the same political leaning as you.
2. In October 2016 you were at a least one event where everyone was congratulating each other that Hil was going to win in a landslide.
3. You live on one of the coasts.
How did I do ?

I hope you don't use the same inference and research skills into trading.
 
Now we know why Flynn lied and plead guilty, why Trump fired Comey to end Flynn's investigation and this was not about 'FIGHTING ISIS' which is a hilarious spin.
You need to start your postings with "In my opinion--" because you certainly do not post facts. You make things up the way you want them to be.
 
Trump's former deputy national security adviser K.T. McFarland told a friend in an email when she was on Trump's transition team that Russia "threw" the U.S. election to Trump, The New York Times reported Saturday.

McFarland reportedly wrote in the email that sanctions then-President Obama levied on Russia in response to Moscow's election meddling would make it more difficult for Trump to improve relations with Russia, "which has just thrown the U.S.A. election to him."

Emails obtained by the Times show that Trump's team moved quickly to develop a strategy on how to reassure Russia after learning that Obama would expel 35 Russian diplomats in the weeks before he left office.

The report comes one day after Trump's former national security adviser Michael Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his contacts with then-Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Sergey Kislyak in the month before Trump took office.

Flynn had previously denied that he discussed sanctions with the Russian official, but later acknowledged that the issue came up. Trump fired him over the issue in February, 24 days after he took the White House post.

McFarland was reportedly aware of Flynn's contact with Moscow. An Associated Press report on Friday identified McFarland as a senior transition official mentioned in court documents who discussed with Flynn in 2016 the U.S. sanctions against Russia and potential retaliation from Moscow.

Outlets also identified Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner as the "very senior transition official" referenced in the documents who reportedly pushed Flynn to persuade the Russian government to vote against a United Nations Security Council resolution condemning Israeli settlements. The U.N. vote ended up advancing.

McFarland served as Trump's deputy national security adviser until May and is currently awaiting confirmation to be his ambassador to Singapore.

http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...icial-in-email-russia-has-just-thrown-the-usa
Huh? Where does it say HOW Russia has thrown the election. By the way, Russia does not ability to throw a US election.
 
I wasn't referring to specifics. I was just pointing out that once again you use sources that are so skewed to the left that they have lost all credibility. Get out of your self reinforcing info loop.

How is an email written by a Trump campaign official a “skewed source”? That is a primary source, the New York Times reported it.
 
How is an email from/to a member of the "transition" team evidence of collusion during the campaign.

I wouldn’t call this evidence of collusion. I would call it evidence of awareness of Russian involvement and impact on the election.
 
How is an email written by a Trump campaign official a “skewed source”? That is a primary source, the New York Times reported it.
You obviously missing the first sentence in my post, or your read comp. needs some work.
 
If you think that russia was the source of the wikileaks and you realize a lot of voters were disgusted by things in those emails you might be think Russia threw the election to trump. That does not mean collusion. That means scum was exposed to light.
 
Back
Top