Trump to cut corporate tax rate to 15%

One. How the fuck do you know what I pay in taxes? Lets get to the point fuck stick. No, they do not reinvest to any great degree. They increase their own personal wealth and they do it on the back of the taxpayers. You, financial and business wizard that you are, can't see the obvious scam so let me clue your dumb ass how things work. Corporations don't pay taxes, none, zero, nada. Never have. Never will. Taxes are overhead and overhead is built into the price for goods and services. The customer pays all the taxes, all the time. Now this tax break might influence demand if they lowered the cost of the price accordingly. They won't, so this free money will have zero influence on demamd. Demand doesn't increase, why hire anyone? Idiots like yourself expext people to believe they'll hire people cause they're nice fucking guys who really care about America. I mean after all, they wear that little flag on their lapel and that's good enough for retards like you. They, like you, only practice capitalism when in comes to taking profits. When it comes to risk, investment and loses they like to spread that around just like the good little socialists they really are. And all of this gets facilitated by our criminal congress. People too fucking stupid to see this scam should not be allowed to vote. That would be you.

giphy.gif
 
What do you think those "boardroom boyz" do with that money? You think they just put it under a mattress and let it sit there? You think they just leave it in their personal checking accounts? These people spend that money on new businesses which means new jobs. They innovate and they use their money to make lives better and they are very efficient at it.

People who don't pay taxes shouldn't get to complain about taxes.



http://www.cnbc.com/2016/09/20/us-c...a-half-trillion-dollars-in-cash-overseas.html

US companies are hoarding $2.5 trillion in cash overseas

Jeff Cox | @JeffCoxCNBCcom
Tuesday, 20 Sep 2016 | 9:47 AM ETCNBC.com



The overseas cash stash for U.S. companies continues to swell, with only scant hope of it being brought back home as Washington continues to debate repatriation.

American companies are holding $2.5 trillion abroad, an increase of nearly 20 percent over the past two years, according to the latest calculations from forecaster Capital Economics. The total is equivalent to nearly 14 percent of total U.S. gross domestic product.
 
What do you think those "boardroom boyz" do with that money? You think they just put it under a mattress and let it sit there? You think they just leave it in their personal checking accounts? These people spend that money on new businesses which means new jobs. They innovate and they use their money to make lives better and they are very efficient at it.

People who don't pay taxes shouldn't get to complain about taxes.

They will invest the money in public equities (furthering the stock market bubble) and they will spend some of the money on luxury goods (which are largely made outside the USA).

The boardroom boyz will only invest in new businesses that will create jobs only if they see the demand for more products and services. Historically, reducing taxes on the wealthy doesn't do that.
 


Germany was the sick man of europe and they had the highest tax rate.

The sick man of the euro | The Economist
www.economist.com/node/209559
Jun 3, 1999 - The biggest economy in the euro area, Germany's, is in a bad way. ... the country is being branded the sick man (or even the Japan) of Europe.

Dropped tax rates and made labor reforms to hold down wages and now they're the country that everyone loves to hate. Because they're too strong or something.
 
This tax gift to the billionaire will not create jobs. Demand for goods/services and price create jobs.Tax cuts create neither. Will the price for products be lowered? No. Will some great new product that everyone just must have suddenly appear? No. Creating jobs is simple and I'm surprised Trump hasn't been able to sell it considering his background. He's wasting time on healtcare insurance reforms which does nothing to address the actaul problem of healthcare cost, and this tax scam. Infrastructure rebuild is the path to fixing the real economy and creating jobs. Of course the hyperventilating right asks how do we pay for it? With a tax, thats how. Oh no, perish the thought. No dumb fucks, a tax is the obvious solution. Everyone who actually works for a living knows how the construction game is played, and so does Trump. You pay to play. The sell is easy. Hey boys, we're going to skim a couple percent out of your check to pay for this rebuild. In turn you get solid work for years to come. Every guy who punches a clock says, when do we start? Demand for necessary products ensue, work from the big boys trickles all through the job market and the economy booms. Or we can just keep feeding the financial rapists who push paper, manipulate markets, stuff their pockets and create nothing.
 
It may be time to to dust off my c corp or make a new one.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/25/us/politics/tax-plan-trump.html

President Trump plans to unveil a tax cut blueprint on Wednesday that would apply a vastly reduced, 15 percent business tax rate not only to corporations but also to companies that now pay taxes through the personal income tax code — from mom-and-pop businesses to his own real estate empire, according to several people briefed on the proposal.



Fuk it, I could get behind the bolded.

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/25/pres...ore-earnings-held-by-us-companies-report.html

Another official said Trump would propose a repatriation tax on offshore earnings of 10 percent, compared with the current 35 percent, the report said.

He will bring back jobs they said. Hahahaha. I suppose something is better than deferral.
 
as far as the economics argument... its very hard to say what the net result of lowering taxes will be.

but if I were to argue in favor of the cut...
1. there should be more investment into businesses here in because the potential return will be much higher
2. this action should prevent and even undue inversions. keeping jobs and cash here
3. it may result in overall much higher tax reveneues as the money from overseas come in... and it could result in higher revenues after that.
4. it may or may not change the behavior of those who already have the billions.

I understand there are counter arguments... but I am always in favor of cutting until we see the cuts fail.

I would have done it differently...
 
Back
Top