Trump talks down dollar, pivots on labeling China a currency manipulator

More Trump flip flops. He ran on the campaign that a strong dollar was good for the United States. Promised to label China a currency manipulator. Looks like now he gave that to Xi in hopes Xi would play ball on North Korea. So I guess that's something.

Also said yesterday he would consider reappointing Yellen to the Fed. Another thing during his campaign he said he would not do. One could argue that Trump has done a decent job negotiating to get some action from parties like China, etc. But that's not the point. What he ran on and what got him elected was one set of commitments, which he is now changing.

cartoon-plane-crash-related-keywords-suggestions-cartoon-plane-3.jpeg


Greenback Stabilizes After Trump-Induced Slide

  • President Trump's comments are the main talking point today
  • The heightened geopolitical worries appear to be easing for the second consecutive session
  • US economic data include PPI, initial jobless claims and the University of Michigan consumer sentiment
  • Brazil cut rates 100 bp, as expected; Chile is expected to keep rates steady at 3.0%
  • MAS and BOK left policy unchanged, as expected

The dollar is mixed against the majors as markets calm after Trump’s comment late yesterday. The dollar bloc is outperforming, while the euro is underperforming. EM currencies are mixed. KRW and TWD are outperforming, while ZAR and TRY are underperforming. MSCI Asia Pacific was up 0.1%, with the Nikkei falling 0.7%. MSCI EM is up 0.5%, with China markets rising 0.2%. Euro Stoxx 600 is down 0.4% near midday, while S&P futures are pointing to a lower open. The 10-year UST yield is down 2 bp at 2.22%. Commodity prices are mixed, with oil flat, copper up nearly 1%, and gold up 0.1%.

President Trump's comments are the main talking point today. His claim that the dollar is too strong is not new, but it is the first time he has ventured down that path since the inauguration. His comments follow a three-month decline in the broad measure of the dollar. If a leader of another country said what he did, they likely would be accused of manipulating their currency. That said, in the US Treasury's criteria of currency manipulation, jawboning does not count. Still, it seems a departure from the G7 and G20 agreements, and like areas, this is an example of unilateralism.

Trump made several other revelations that may be important for investors. He revealed that China will not be cited as a manipulator, but refused to be drawn into a discussion whether this was partly in exchange for cooperation from China on the North Korea issue. A few hours before Trump's interview was released, China abstained from the UN Security Council resolution condemning the chemical attack in Syria. Since 2011, China has vetoed US-sponsored Security Council resolutions on Syria. Russia vetoed it yesterday. Abstaining sent an important diplomatic signal.

The US President also changed his stance regarding NATO. He said it is no longer obsolete. However, he still harangued NATO head Stoltenberg about compensation for the US carrying the load for NATO. Two overlooked points should be noted. First, Germany's Vice Chancellor has argued that in addition to the country's 1.2% defense budget, it spent around 0.7% on dealing with refugees in part from past military efforts, like in Libya. Second, in a ground war, Germany and Europe will likely pay much more than 2% of GDP. The US may pay in advance, Europe later.

Trump also reversed his earlier opposition to the Export-Import Bank. He also returned to an earlier position that health care reform needs to precede tax reform. He also had spoken well of Yellen and kept the door open to her reappointment. Volcker, Greenspan and Bernanke, the last three Fed chairs, were each appointed by the President of one party and reappointed by the President of the other party. His admission of preferring low interest rate policy is not surprising, though he accused Yellen during the campaign of keeping rates low to help Clinton. Preferences do not drive exchange or interest rates, and low rates seem to run against the stronger growth that he is advocating.
 
Looks like now he gave that to Xi in hopes Xi would play ball on North Korea. So I guess that's something.

One could argue that Trump has done a decent job negotiating to get some action from parties like China, etc.


China warning against force,NK making threats and Trump planning for more sanctions,nothing has changed and Xi is playing Trump for a fool.


http://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-event-idUSKBN17E2CT

China warns against force as North Korea prepares celebration


World News | Thu Apr 13, 2017 | 7:47am EDT



By Michael Martina and Sue-Lin Wong | BEIJING/PYONGYANG

Military force cannot resolve tension over North Korea, China said on Thursday, while an influential Chinese newspaper urged the North to halt its nuclear programme in exchange for Chinese protection.

With a U.S. aircraft carrier group steaming to the area and tension rising, South Korea said it believed the United States would consult it before any pre-emptive strike against the North.

Fears have been growing that the reclusive North could soon conduct its sixth nuclear test or more missile launches in defiance of U.N. sanctions and stark warnings from the United States that a policy of patience was over.

China, North Korea's sole major ally and benefactor, which nevertheless opposes its weapons programme, has called for talks leading to a peaceful resolution and the denuclearisation of the peninsula.

"Military force cannot resolve the issue," Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told reporters in Beijing.

"Amid challenge there is opportunity. Amid tensions we will also find a kind of opportunity to return to talks."

While U.S. President Donald Trump has put North Korea on notice that he would not tolerate any provocation, U.S. officials have said his administration was focusing its strategy on tougher economic sanctions.

Trump has diverted the USS Carl Vinson aircraft carrier group towards the Korean peninsula, which could take more than a week to arrive, in a show of force aimed at deterring North Korea from conducting another nuclear test or launching more missiles to coincide with important events and anniversaries.

Speculation about U.S. military action grew after the U.S. Navy fired 59 Tomahawk missiles at a Syrian airfield last week in response to a deadly gas attack.

Wang warned that history would hold any instigator to account.

"Whoever provokes the situation, whoever continues to make trouble in this place, they will have to assume historical responsibility," Wang said.

South Korean Foreign Minister Yun Byung-se told parliament in Seoul he believed Washington would consult Seoul if it was considering a pre-emptive strike. The United States has about 28,500 troops in South Korea.

A Washington-based think-tank that monitors North Korea, 38 North, said satellite images on Wednesday showed activity around the North's Punggye-ri nuclear test site on the east coast that indicated it was ready for a new test.

South Korean officials said there were no new signs to indicate a test was more likely, although they also said the North appeared ready to conduct a test at any time.

An influential state-backed Chinese newspaper said the best option for North Korea and its leader, Kim Jong Un, was to give up its nuclear programme, and China would protect it if it did.

"As soon as North Korea complies with China's declared advice and suspends nuclear activities ... China will actively work to protect the security of a denuclearised North Korean nation and regime," said an editorial in the Global Times, which is published by the Communist party's People's Daily.

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe underscored fears about threats from North Korea, telling parliament in Tokyo that Pyongyang could have the capacity to deliver missiles equipped with sarin nerve gas.

A senior Japanese diplomat said the United States was putting "maximum pressure" on North Korea to resolve issues peacefully while putting responsibility on China to sway its old ally.

"We will watch what action China takes," the diplomat said.

While Japan did not see a high risk of military action, it expected to be consulted by the United States if it decided to attack. North Korea has about 350 missiles that can hit Japan.
 
One of the arguments against Trump was that he had no core principles. He's a if you throw enough shit at the wall, some of it's bound to stick kind of guy. I would also say he forms very strong opinions, acts on them impulsively, and if they work takes all the credit. If not, looks for someone else to blame. He has enjoyed some small success, but continues to disappoint and alarm. I'd say he's one major screw up from being a lame duck. Congress will just shut him down and ride it out till the end of his term. Problematic for republicans at the polling stations come election time. Dems still a poor alternative. Perfect time for a thorough house cleaning, top to bottom.
 
China warning against force,NK making threats and Trump planning for more sanctions,nothing has changed and Xi is playing Trump for a fool.

There's certainly a fool in this conversation, AK Forty Seven/Range Rover. It's just not who you think it is.
 
One of the arguments against Trump was that he had no core principles. He's a if you throw enough shit at the wall, some of it's bound to stick kind of guy. I would also say he forms very strong opinions, acts on them impulsively, and if they work takes all the credit. If not, looks for someone else to blame. He has enjoyed some small success, but continues to disappoint and alarm. I'd say he's one major screw up from being a lame duck. Congress will just shut him down and ride it out till the end of his term. Problematic for republicans at the polling stations come election time. Dems still a poor alternative. Perfect time for a thorough house cleaning, top to bottom.

Great post.
 
One of the arguments against Trump was that he had no core principles. He's a if you throw enough shit at the wall, some of it's bound to stick kind of guy. I would also say he forms very strong opinions, acts on them impulsively, and if they work takes all the credit. If not, looks for someone else to blame. He has enjoyed some small success, but continues to disappoint and alarm. I'd say he's one major screw up from being a lame duck. Congress will just shut him down and ride it out till the end of his term. Problematic for republicans at the polling stations come election time. Dems still a poor alternative. Perfect time for a thorough house cleaning, top to bottom.


This was always the worry. If he avoids getting us into another pointless Bush-style war and holds the line on immigration, I will be ok. He really does need to reflect on who his friends are though. Picking a fight with the Freedom Caucus was just dumb. That was clearly Jared and his NYC buddies, plus Trump being annoyed at taking a hit. He has to understand that just because he has no fixed principles, it doesn't mean no one does.
 
This was always the worry. If he avoids getting us into another pointless Bush-style war and holds the line on immigration, I will be ok. He really does need to reflect on who his friends are though. Picking a fight with the Freedom Caucus was just dumb. That was clearly Jared and his NYC buddies, plus Trump being annoyed at taking a hit. He has to understand that just because he has no fixed principles, it doesn't mean no one does.
I tend to agree though war may be inevitable. Whatever the case, the guy needs to pick his poison and stick with it. Right now he's trying to be all things to all people. He's all over the place, although IMO his bigger problem is not knowing who he can trust. He has few friends and is finding out that draining the swamp means pissing off the alligators and political gators are similar to real gators. They've been around a really long time are are tough to kill.
 
The model he needs to avoid is George Bush Sr., who got elected by talking Reagan, quickly got us into a stupid war, then betrayed his supporters by signing on to a tax increase he had vowed to oppose. The ramifications included 9/11 and eight years of Bill Clinton. Great summary by Ann Coulter:

" War is like crack for presidents. It confers instant gravitas, catapulting them to respectability, bypassing all station stops. They get to make macho pronouncements on a topic where every utterance is seen as august.

On the other hand, Trump's Syrian misadventure is immoral, violates every promise he ran on and could sink his presidency.

Left to his own devices, uncontaminated by Washington group-think, Trump gets it right. "

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2017-04-12.html#read_more
 
The model he needs to avoid is George Bush Sr., who got elected by talking Reagan, quickly got us into a stupid war, then betrayed his supporters by signing on to a tax increase he had vowed to oppose. The ramifications included 9/11 and eight years of Bill Clinton. Great summary by Ann Coulter:

" War is like crack for presidents. It confers instant gravitas, catapulting them to respectability, bypassing all station stops. They get to make macho pronouncements on a topic where every utterance is seen as august.

On the other hand, Trump's Syrian misadventure is immoral, violates every promise he ran on and could sink his presidency.

Left to his own devices, uncontaminated by Washington group-think, Trump gets it right. "

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2017-04-12.html#read_more
He didn't get us in a stupid war unless you mean drugs. He went in, accomplished the mission, and got the hell out when the people were begging for more. Or did you mean George Bush the other one.
 
Back
Top