Trump: Shut down the Clinton Foundation

What I cannot find is a single indication of intelligence in any of your posts on this subject matter. You cannot even reconcile Conway's praise for the foundation with your crap and you refuse to even confront it. How does that manage to escape you?

The statements show a lot of money being spent on their various initiatives. What, exactly, were you looking for? You haven't answered that question. You are just being vaguely dismissive. Like you know something no one else does. Was the font or color of the text not to your liking? WTF is the matter with you?

"Affected"
 
11 Calls to Shut Down Clinton Foundation from Left-Wing Media
hillary-hair.jpg

New reporting on allegations that Hillary Clinton used her position as Secretary of State to sell access to major Clinton Foundation donors — charges first detailed in Breitbart News Senior Editor-at-Large Peter Schweizer’s New York Times bestselling book Clinton Cash — have led to a flood of calls from left-wing and center-left media for the Clintons to shut down their multibillion-dollar charity.

Below is a list of eleven of these establishment outlets and journalists urging the Clintons either to shutter the Foundation or pass off its assets to some other unaffiliated nonprofit.

1. The Huffington Post

The Huffington Post began the week with a front page banner that read “Just Shut it Down.” The HuffPo headline linked to a New York Times article that shined the spotlight on several major Clinton Foundation donors who saw their multi-million dollar donations coincide with favorable federal actions while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.

2. The Washington Post

The Washington Post editorial board wrote Wednesday that “should Ms. Clinton win, all of that work and all of the foundation’s assets should be spun off to an organization with no ties to the first family.”

3. USA Today

The USA Today editorial board said Wednesday that “the only way to eliminate the odor surrounding the foundation is to wind it down and put it in mothballs, starting today, and transfer its important charitable work to another large American charity such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.”

4. The New Yorker

Writing in The New Yorker, John Cassidy argues: “Rather than torpedoing the foundation, it would surely make more sense, at least for the duration of a Clinton Presidency, to separate it from its founding family and turn it into an independent organization run and overseen by people unconnected to the Clintons. The reforms that Bill Clinton announced on Monday go some way in this direction, but not far enough.”

5. The Boston Globe

Last week, the Boston Globe editorial board asserted that “the Clintons should move now to end donations to the Foundation, and make plans to shut it down in November.”

6. Slate

Over the weekend, Slate senior writer Josh Voorhees wrote that “as long as Hillary Clinton is either running for the White House or running the country from inside it, she and her husband should temporarily shutter their foundation.”

7. The Daily Beast

Daily Beast special correspondant Michael Tomasky wrote Tuesday that “The Clintons should shut the foundation down.”

8. Huffington Post Senior Politics Editor Sam Stein

In an appearance Wednesday on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, Stein said, “[T]hey definitely need to shut this thing down or transfer it to the — to some other foundation. … I mean, can you imagine, the people she’s going to have to meet with as president, assuming she wins, it’ just going overlap constantly. We’ll have stories like this nonstop. There’s too much ethical murkiness here.”

9. Huffington Post Washington bureau chief Ryan Grim

Grim took to Twitter on Monday and mocked the Clinton Foundation, writing: “If you shut down the Clinton Foundation. How would the world’s oligarchs achieve their main goal in life, eradicating disease and poverty??”

10. Longtime Clinton ally and former Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell

Last week, Rendell told the New York Daily News he believes that if Hillary Clinton wins in November that the Clinton foundation should be disbanded. “It’d be impossible to keep the foundation open without at least the appearance of a problem.”

11. New York Magazine columnist Jonathan Chait

Oft-celebrated left-wing columnist Jonathan Chait wrote last week that “the Clinton Foundation needs to die.”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journa...publications-calling-clinton-foundation-shut/
 
If the Clinton Foundation is truly a charity, it will be an unspeakable mistake to shut it down:

Is the Clinton Foundation Really a Charity?

"...Though the foundation has claimed that 88 percent of its expenditures are spent on good deeds, their own tax filings reveal that the real number is about ten percent. But far from being an unrelated, albeit embarrassing, sidebar to the allegations about influence peddling, this data is a reminder that the main point of the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation is to support its namesakes in a lavish fashion and to allow wealthy donors access to them...."


https://www.commentarymagazine.com/...s/is-the-clinton-foundation-really-a-charity/
 
But Freddy Flabbergasted "knows better" than all of the left wing media that "they do good work"...
Me and Kellyanne Conway, remember? Bet you can't reconcile her assertion either.

Oh, and you're slipping on your own slime. Several of the writers did not allude that the foundation is flawed, and at least one of its detractors is a neocon who "contributed" to a liberal medium.

You guys are so utterly full of shit and such a waste of time.
 
These two articles with in=depth information skewer the claims by Clinton supporters that the Clinton foundation provides 88% to charity (or even is a charity) - the actual number is under 10%

http://thefederalist.com/2015/04/27...0-percent-of-its-budget-on-charitable-grants/

http://thefederalist.com/2015/04/29/punditfact-a-case-study-in-fact-free-hackery/

The Clinton Foundation announced last week that it would be refiling its tax returns for the last five years because it had improperly failed to disclose millions of dollars in donations from foreign sources while Hillary Clinton was serving as Secretary of State.

Why is this not tax fraud? Or does the 1-99 rule apply here?
 
Me and Kellyanne Conway, remember? Bet you can't reconcile her assertion either.

Oh, and you're slipping on your own slime. Several of the writers did not allude that the foundation is flawed, and at least one of its detractors is a neocon who "contributed" to a liberal medium.

You guys are so utterly full of shit and such a waste of time.

Here is a link to the Clinton Foundation Annual Reports, Financials & Tax-Exempt Materials.
Read in detail and learn the facts.
 
Back
Top