Actually, that's precisely what partiality looks like.
According to you, when "issues" arise in a democratic arena, they are labeled "mistakes" or "unfortunate" and excuses are made. On the off chance there is no way you can not call it corruption, you shift blame to previous republican administrations or to someone not a democrat.
You are the living, breathing, very definition of partisanship and partiality.
nope...a mistake, and an unfortunate action don't necessarily have a corrupt action behind it. I believe Bush's actions in Iraq were a mistake and unfortunate, because I don't necessarily believe Bush to have acted corruptly, but rather ineptly. That doesn't mean actors in the shadows (Cheney) did not have corrupt intentions of getting a war started, and their contractors and energy companies involved.
Show me proof of corrupt intent behind Fast and Furious, VA wait lists, NSA spying and DOJ phone tapping (this latter being a corruption of our rights, and I admonished Obama & Holder for continuing and expanding the practice started under Bush)
I am the living, breathing, very definition of objectivity and impartiality; and it pains you.