Well Divine intervention already saved his life, so it's possible.
Go to 11 minute mark for evidence. Video was posted 3 months before the assassination attempt.
God is real btw
The ability to tell the future should tell you something about time itself.
Time is not the linear phenom of conventional wisdom.
The ability to tell the future means that the event has already happened...from another perspective. This should also raise serious questions about
what, then, is happenstance?
All happenstance, past present and future, is stored (so to speak) similar to how we store digital information.
We can store an entire movie on a CD diskette, including the past present and future of the movie. From the holders perspective (the owner of the CD) the entire movie is in the past. However, if you admit that the movie is a fiction, then it gets harder to argue from the perspective of past, present and future. Does a fiction have a past or future?
Nevertheless, from the perspective of a personality that is experiencing the movie from within it, then past, present and future are all too real.
The storage facility for all happenstance in the movie we experience as real has sometimes been called the "Akashic Records". Again, you don't necessarily need to be "the Lord" in order to "read" them and convey what they say.
Arguably, the records also contain a version of the movie where Trump was not shot at, and yet another version where the bullet hit the intended target (Trump). These would be the storyline of three different versions of history, requiring three different universi.
Arguably, there is a different universe for each significant decision or event that happens.
All happenstance of time is made up by one mind. If you want to name that mind you could call it "God" or "the Lord". But i call it the proverbial "Prodigal Son", which is basically a mischief maker whose imagination never exceeds what we can call "drama".
The thought of the prodigal son is theoretically backed by unlimited power, such that the scenarios it dreams up are vivified to where the characters take on a life of their own, seeing the scene from so many various perspectives, every one of them thinking this is real, and happening in a linear fashion.
Arguably, each and every character is the prodigal son, as an extension of its thought processes.
In this way the prodigal son explores every possibility of the possibility that there might be more than (what i will call) the Original Condition.
Finding it impossible to add more to the Original Condition, the happenstance of time comes to an "end" as surely as it had a "beginning".
This means that all of the drama has been for naught, to no purpose, and for no gain.
This is all to say that readings about the future may be classified in two ways:
1) those that perpetuate the drama, adding more layers of drama.
2) those that prescribe the drama, functioning to delete scenes, save time, and bring the whole experience to an end for all participants.
Those readings of the future which function to bring time to an end for participants do not come from the prodigal son, which is too often called "God" and/or "the Lord".
Arguably, you don't have to be "the Lord" to tell the future.
What makes the drama is incapable of de-escalation so-to-speak. At best it is capable of cease and desist.
What can de-escalate is well beyond "God" and/or "the Lord" and does not have a name.
If i were forced to invent a name, however, i would call it Christ! ...with an exclamation mark to signify a term of astonishment.
This is all to say that in my opinion, as a rule of thumb, any kind of preacher who calls themselves Christian, as commonly understood, is adding a layer of drama to the main drama whenever they read out information about the future.
Elevating the source of the information to "the Lord" merely adds drama to the drama. It doesn't clarify anything about time. Absent the mechanics of how time functions, what it is, and/or what it isn't...the reading is bound to only add drama.
The effect of drama is to capture your attention. A "good" movie, for example, will successfully get you to "suspend disbelief", and watch all the way to the end as you gladly volunteer to "believe" it.
To the extent that the drama is successful, it will capture your attention until the very end of the movie...instead of saving time by walking out before it is finished.
If you really understood time, you would also understand that you can walk out of it...any time.
Therefore, the drama will not help you understand time, or how happenstance is stored, or how you come to experience happenstance as if it were real.
Understanding helps you save time.
Arguably, that is all that can be saved (time), if you know how the story ends.
Ideally you would get a spoiler alert and walk out of the theater before experiencing any more depression, death and/or destruction.
A "Christian" preacher is not going to tell you how to walk out, prematurely.
Arguably, they will have you watch and wait till the very end. According to them,
the end must come before you can walk out. As such, you must remain a prisoner of time.
Thats how you can tell the difference between what saves you, and what delays you.
So, from some source, yes, it could be foretold that Trump would be shot at, and the bullet would whiz by his ear.
Beware that you allow this to ratify an entire philosophy designed to waste your time.