Interesting idea, he is the first to run for re-election while impeached. I'd not blink anymore if that happened.
It is not a witch hunt though, his name is Donald so it is a duck hunt.
Trump Says He Can Pardon Himself
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
Interesting idea, he is the first to run for re-election while impeached. I'd not blink anymore if that happened.
It is not a witch hunt though, his name is Donald so it is a duck hunt.
What do you think of Jordon Peterson?
"Max E., post: 4665434, member: 267088"]Sorry guys i know this takes atleast 2 hours, but if you have time during the trading day tomorow, this is it!!!!!
"Max E., post: 4665434, member: 267088"]Sorry guys i know this takes atleast 2 hours, but if you have time during the trading day tomorow, this is it!!!!!
Peterson is for philistines who have never read any philosophy or psychology book in their lives, even basic concepts are a great revelation to these idiots.
Excellent video. Jordan Peterson is a clinical psycologist who understands human behaviour and provides excellent life advise. In addition, towrds the end of this video, he talks about the negative effect of simple carbohydrates and starches on one’s energy level and health. I took Jordan’s diet advise 24 hours before waking today up exuberant and energetic. Although I believe starches have an important role for impending high endurance excercise of over, say, 1500 calories, I believe most people will benefit from Jordan’s diet advise.
Jordan shows his political naivity when said he could not understand why the media does not promote the fundamental, basic life advise he is talking about. Our big goverment needs problems to stay relevant and big. This is why a large part of the media promotes problems and not solutions. The “We need the government to do something about this horrible _________” type of thinking seems to prevail.
The video is worth watching several times and it may be beneficial to take notes.
My life has already been improved by this video and I will use some of it’s content in client presentations to help inprove their lives as well.
A big thank you to Max E.
P.S. Joe Rogan in a great interviewer and helped Jordan clarify some of his own ideas.
Like. Like. Like
From future urgent and my response below:
Not everybody is persuaded that Peterson is a thinker of substance, however. Last November, fellow University of Toronto professor Ira Wells called him “the professor of piffle” – a YouTube star rather than a credible intellectual. Tabatha Southey, a columnist for the Canadian magazine Macleans, designated him“the stupid man’s smart person”.
“Peterson’s secret sauce is to provide an academic veneer to a lot of old-school rightwing cant, including the notion that most academia is corrupt and evil, and banal self-help patter,” says Southey. “He’s very much a cult thing, in every regard. I think he’s a goof, which does not mean he’s not dangerous.”
Rather than promoting blatant bigotry, like the far right, he claims that concepts fundamental to social-justice movements, such as the existence of patriarchy and other forms of structural oppression, are treacherous illusions, and that he can prove this with science. Hence: “The idea that women were oppressed throughout history is an appalling theory.” Islamophobia is “a word created by fascists and used by cowards to manipulate morons”. White privilege is “a Marxist lie”. Believing that gender identity is subjective is “as bad as claiming that the world is flat”
https://www.theguardian.com/science...he-rightwing-professor-who-hit-a-hornets-nest
Yeah, I'm going with the bolded above.
More...
MaximumPossibleSuffering:
Simple, fundamentally sound concepts are valid and sometimes it takes an exceptionally smart person to realize and accept this. Remember, Jordan peterson is a clinical psycologist and college level teacher. His observations of young people and families over the years appears to have led him to the conclusions that proper diet helps people focus and that many young people from broken or disfunctional families don’t really know where to begin when they are on their own for the first time.
Jordan Peterson offers fundamentally sound life advice (Excuse all my misspellings in my prior post). What does the author who characterizes Jordan as the “Stupid Man’s Smart Person” offer?
It seems the Guardian(UK based) author is part of an agenda that attempts to instigate controversy and disfunction in society. By the way, the UK culture seems to be falling apart according to some media sources. The Guardian does not appear to be the UK’s friend either.
Sounds like there is an UK-based enclave of an organized political group that has interests in U.S. politics. A lot of the “evidence” for the Russia Investigation was apparently from the UK. I wonder if this was done for reasons of legal safety?
Futurecurrents, you may want to look at this situation more critically. You deciding that “Going with the Stupid Man’s Smart Person” simplistic phrase implies you are easy to game. Figure it out: One side wants to help society, the other side wants to help themselves above all else.
Again, what kind of solution does the author of the Guardian’s article offer that would benefit society?
Now let’s talk about the practical differences between men and women and how these basic biological differences effect life choices. The fact that men and women tend to seek out jobs that have a disproportionately large number of one sex or another does not automatically imply there is sexism or other type of descimination. Jordan says men tend to be interested in things and women tend to be interested in people. There are no real barriers for a determined and competent women to achieve whatever she wants. It seems the Left has few real issues they can competently handle, so they will make up issues in an attempt to stay politically relevant.
It has been exposed recently where air traffic controller testing has been “dumbed” down and work history requirements have been relaxed in the Obama administration in order for these jobs to be more “inclusive”. This is bad policy that increases the likelihood of an accident and would require the government to “intervene” in order to justify it’s largeness.
Certain elements of our political system create problems so they will have something to fix in order to justify their existence.
Figure it out, support those ideas that benefit society, and prosper.
#29 Today at 2:28 AMReport
Reply Share
gwb-trading and vanzandt like this.
These are the same people who consider Trump a role model and worth supporting.
“Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart — you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I’m one of the smartest people anywhere in the world — it’s true! — but when you’re a conservative Republican they try — oh, do they do a number — that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune — you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged — but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me — it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are — nuclear is powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what’s going to happen and he was right, who would have thought? — but when you look at what’s going on with the four prisoners — now it used to be three, now it’s four — but when it was three and even now, I would have said it’s all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don’t, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years — but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us.”
"DON'T VOTE FOR HILLARY, SHE THINKS SHE'S ABOVE THE LAW!"
GIULIANI: Trump could murder Cohen then pardon himself, true story.
Speaking of the rule of law, what law or laws, in Moooler's opinion, did the Russian satirists break, who were indicted for pushing a social media agenda?
Peterson is what he is to me for now some good, some problems however I am always wary of the 'Peter principle' with such guys. They advance to their level of competence and no more until they re-invent themselves and start a new tack. Everyone does of course however where that ceiling is and how they react when they get there tells a lot of a man.
Right now Peterson is a great joy to people who's opinions and beliefs are opaque even to themselves. He says what they are trying to say, they think, Sam Harris, Hitchens etc. to varying degrees are similar. I see with Peterson (and not saying he can avoid this) a problem with guys looking for little more than troll ammo (Alt-right dopes etc). I have seen him resist this, so while he does good. Is he a truly great mind beyond a little charisma? No, however he can be entertaining at least. This may change as he hits the ceiling, in five(ish) years I would have a better idea as his celebrity is new.
My only beef is he hesitates to call out the alt right on their bullshit in fear of triggering this newfound ba$e.
I wasn't thinking of Peterson when I asked the question, nor have I seen his talk with Rogan.
I am noting exGOP's reticence to answer any questions related to Russian involvement in US voter-rich social media, and what, if any, laws, in Moooler's opinion, they seem to have broken.
I'm asking because he seems alacritous that Trump follow US law, and be held liable to US law, according to the standard that no one is above the law.