Trump Reverses Himself On 6 Major Issues In 2 Days

[jem]

Not true... actually a completely false piece of b.s.

Nate Silver (I posted it to the thread before election day) explained using models that if the polls were inside the margin for error there was a strong chance Trump would win. Because Hillary had so many excess votes in CA and NY and a few other spots.

If your teams slanted polls had used proper samples as the JEM Algo had been illustrating the whole country would have known the race was very close most of the last 6 months.

Instead your team used very slanted polls in an attempt to make Trump look un-electable.

It would be interesting to know if that backfired on them. Did that suppress hillarys vote or trumps or did it have no impact? Or was it cover for the planned election rigging like the one in Detroit.

If the national polls were accurate,which they were,than Hillary had around a 90 % chance of winning.I and the majority of political people sided with the 90 % odds.

 

[Tony Stark]

Not true... actually a completely false piece of b.s.

Nate Silver (I posted it to the thread before election day) explained using models that if the polls were inside the margin for error there was a strong chance Trump would win. Because Hillary had so many excess votes in CA and NY and a few other spots.

If your teams slanted polls had used proper samples as the JEM Algo had been illustrating the whole country would have known the race was very close most of the last 6 months.

Instead your team used very slanted polls in an attempt to make Trump look un-electable.

It would be interesting to know if that backfired on them. Did that suppress hillarys vote or trumps or did it have no impact? Or was it cover for the planned election rigging like the one in Detroit.

National polls consistently showed Hillary getting more votes,and she got 3 million more votes.Person who got more votes had won 53 out of 57 Presidential elections.

Trump only won Pennsylvania ,Wisconsin and Michigan by a combined 78,000 votes.

 

[Tony Stark]

It would be interesting to know if that backfired on them. Did that suppress hillarys vote or trumps or did it have no impact?

I think it hurt Hillary.Polls consistently showing her ahead likely made a lot of dems think they didn't have to go out and vote

 

[WeToddDid2]

We are all getting a nearly hands on view of the Narcissistic personality disorder in action. A clinical internship could hardly be more instructive. We shall all be experts on this one particular psychological malady before it's over. One of the several things we have learned so far is that others will learn to deal with it if the narcissist provides them with a job and/or a nice lifestyle.

Congrats! You have become better at libtard propaganda regurgitation than Fraudcurrents. Is piezoe a type of parrot?

 

[jem]

that national polls consistently had hillary winning with massive leads. Then they crookedly unskewed in front of the election as predicted but the moron press and the msm did not take nate silvers warning and the jem algos finding that Turmp could win because the numbers were inside the margin for error.

They had hillary with a massive lead and she lost. period.
She lost. Everybody on the left was stunned.
Crest fallen crying could not believe it.

Your polls got it dramatically incorrect.

to review

They picked the wrong candidate and the vote totals were inside the margin of error. They should have showed the votes totals would be inside the margins of error to be correct.

Just as nice Silver warned was a possibility and the jem algo told you.

When the race finished inside the margin of error... and the polls were picking hillary by a large they got it dramatically incorrect.

National polls consistently showed Hillary getting more votes,and she got 3 million more votes.Person who got more votes had won 53 out of 57 Presidential elections.

Trump only won Pennsylvania ,Wisconsin and Michigan by a combined 78,000 votes.

 

[Tony Stark]

Your polls got it dramatically incorrect.

Around 80-90 % of RCP national polls from summer to election day showed Hillary getting more votes than Trump,and she got 3 million more votes than Trump.

 

[peilthetraveler]

National polls consistently showed Hillary getting more votes,and she got 3 million more votes.Person who got more votes had won 53 out of 57 Presidential elections.

Trump only won Pennsylvania ,Wisconsin and Michigan by a combined 78,000 votes.

You're acting like those 3 million votes were spread out over 1000s of miles all over the country. All those extra votes came from a 75 mile radius in Southern California.

 

[jem]

to be correct they should have been showing the race was too close to call and that Trump could win.

Because that is what honest modeling showed.

Besides you seem to be the only person on the planet pretending the polls got it correct..

here is one of the thousands of articles from leftist publications who state the polls got it wrong.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-clinton-2016-presidential-election/93523012/

Pollsters flubbed the 2016 presidential election in seismic fashion.

Donald Trump's victory dealt a devastating blow to the credibility of the nation's leading pollsters, calling into question their mathematical models, assumptions and survey methods.

Several months of polls pegged Hillary Clinton as the leader in the polarizing race and as the leader in many key battleground states.

Around 80-90 % of RCP national polls from summer to election day showed Hillary getting more votes than Trump,and she got 3 million more votes than Trump.

 

[Tony Stark]

You're acting like those 3 million votes were spread out over 1000s of miles all over the country. All those extra votes came from a 75 mile radius in Southern California.

3 million is 3 million,its the same country.

 

[Tony Stark]

Besides you seem to be the only person on the planet pretending the polls got it correct..

If the national polls showed Hillary would get more votes,and she got 3 million more votes,the polls got it correct.Hillary just had the bad luck of being one of the 10 % that loses the election but more people voted for her.53 out 58 elections the person with the most votes won.