That is true. However PPP does no paid lobbying. Also as outlined in your first posted article their polling techniques are very different than Civitas and much less likely to be biased. Also PPP has a long record of being one of the most accurate polling firms in our state with polls with a large number of respondents that are statistically reliable.
Are you still sticking by your assertion that 30% of black voters in North Carolina are going to vote for Trump?
The article I sited says quote:
"Meanwhile, Public Policy Polling, a local polling firm that works mainly for Democratic candidates and causes, claims nearly the opposite."
So you say they aren't biased and do no lobbying. Do they work for democratic causes for free? Is that what you think? Do you think being paid to provide biased polls with the intent to effect legislation as a subcontractor for a lobbyist is not the same as lobbying?
And you give a lengthy cut and paste about civitas bias from the article and neglect the bias that the same article explains exist in PPP.
Why are you telling me they don't get paid to lobby and they aren't biased? The very article we are reading from at wral says the exact opposite.
Here's what you said above:
"My primary issue is with polls from political think tanks which are paid to lobby for particular positions on issues and then create the majority of their polls to support the positions they are lobbying for. Civitas is an example of this problem."
And so after saying that political think tanks that are paid to lobby are a problem and it makes Civitas a joke, you go on to defend PPP, a democratic polling firm and use arguments that are made up and untrue.
I keep asking myself what kind of republican does this?
re: do i still stand by my assertion about civitas poll
I already answered that in post 51
Last edited:
