You have not addressed how those who live in the Farm and Rust Belts, which represent the majority of land ownership in the United States would be able to receive representation at the Executive level.
So far, you have responded with deflections twice. As a reminder, in my first post, an area of concern was little to no voter validation in our current election process and the need for it. As we have seen, there is an example of someone who committed election fraud. By logical extension, if our system is under attack, we should defend against that attack. It is not conceivable to you that an entity who gains political power by violating election law is the worst sort of politician? Really, by definition, an enemy of the people? What should we call those people who knowingly (Or unknowingly) support that entity by denying common sense protections of our elections?
Again, a corrupt entity would certainly attempt to circumvent and campaign against election protections, would it not?
Please answer the above question directly, without a deflection this time, please.
I did not deflect,I agreed with you.
Let the will of the people determine who gets elected to represent them, bottom line.The president is the leader of the nation and the person that the most people vote for should be president.The minority certainly shouldn't be ruling the majority.
It is unrealistic to think that 100% of voter fruad will be caught.Republicans keep saying its a huge widespread problem but only a few people of 130 million voters is thier only proof,that is not a widespread problem.