Trump may doubt climate change, but Pentagon sees it as a ‘threat multiplier’

[jem]

you have no peer reviewed science showing man made co2 causes warming... yet you pretend the issue is settled.

you are pushing propaganda.

if you wish to prove me wrong... post to peer reviewed science saying man made co2 causes warming.

Blah blah blah, you think you are spouting some special knowledge here?

The issue is settled by science, even a skeptic who analyzed the data himself says so - what studies have you done other than copy pasting right wing drivel?

 

[exGOPer]

you have no peer reviewed science showing man made co2 causes warming... yet you pretend the issue is settled.

you are pushing propaganda.

if you wish to prove me wrong... post to peer reviewed science saying man made co2 causes warming.

LOL, so the paper published by a Koch funded scientist with a long history of skepticism is propaganda.

So tell me this, is Mattis part of the propaganda machine? Is Trump's pentagon part of the conspiracy?

 

[Overnight]

Trump needs to stop sniffing Bacos Bits. That shit will rot the brain.

 

[java]

'In their minds'

Funny how conservatives around the globe have no problem with the science but for US cons, it's 'them'. They have no problems peddling conspiracy theories but science - no sir, that's just so beneath us.

Don't forget to bring the newspaper if you show up to the debate.

 

[exGOPer]

Don't forget to bring the newspaper if you show up to the debate.

Right, let's ignore the Pentagon, NASA, scientists and educational institutions around the world - the real scientists are the conservatives in the Republican party who voted and support a birther who can't stop lying.

 

[java]

Right, let's ignore the Pentagon, NASA, scientists and educational institutions around the world - the real scientists are the conservatives in the Republican party who voted and support a birther who can't stop lying.

Does the Pentagon still have to reduce their co2 emissions if they are fighting in China? Does the pentagon have any data that shows man made co2 causes global warming? or are they just taking your word for it. Post the pentagon papers and someone here will point out where you are wrong and give you a C for effort and an F for reading comprehension.

 

[exGOPer]

Does the Pentagon still have to reduce their co2 emissions if they are fighting in China? Does the pentagon have any data that shows man made co2 causes global warming? or are they just taking your word for it. Post the pentagon papers and someone here will point out where you are wrong and give you a C for effort and an F for reading comprehension.

Do I look like Pentagon spokesperson?

 

[viruscore1]

It's a hoax and money grab for greenies. Earth has always been evolving. Most C02 is produced naturally. Sure we should reduce our green foot print , just like we should all eat less, exercise more, walk vs drive and pass less gas hahaha. Save the earth! How much do we need to spend on that?
http://whatsyourimpact.org/greenhouse-gases/carbon-dioxide-emissions

 

[Cuddles]

It's a hoax and money grab for greenies. Earth has always been evolving. Most C02 is produced naturally. Sure we should reduce our green foot print , just like we should all eat less, exercise more, walk vs drive and pass less gas hahaha. Save the earth! How much do we need to spend on that?
http://whatsyourimpact.org/greenhouse-gases/carbon-dioxide-emissions

Did you selectively read the source? Because on skimming through it:
Human sources of carbon dioxide are much smaller than natural emissions but they upset the balance in the carbon cycle that existed before the Industrial Revolution. The amount of carbon dioxide produced by natural sources is completely offset by natural carbon sinks and has been for thousands of years. Before the influence of humans, carbon dioxide levels were quite steady because of this natural balance.4

 

[Arnie]

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/national-security/article153908824.html

But what does the Pentagon, NASA, all the scientists and institutions know? Ask the Seth Rich conspiracy theorists who get their info from Kim Dotcom and Pamela Dotnet about climate science.

Naval Base Ventura County in southern California has lost about 400 feet of beach since the 1940s. The sea level at Naval Station Norfolk in Virginia has risen 14.5 inches in the century since World War I, when the facility was built.

When I see a factually incorrect statement, then why should I believe anything else in the article? Over half the "rise" is due to subsidence.

This is from the USGS, but what the hell do they know about climate change.

Land Subsidence and Relative Sea-Level Rise in the Southern Chesapeake Bay Region

By Jack Eggleston and Jason Pope

The southern Chesapeake Bay region is experiencing land subsidence and rising water levels due to global sea-level rise; land subsidence and rising water levels combine to cause relative sea-level rise. Land subsidence has been observed since the 1940s in the southern Chesapeake Bay region at rates of 1.1 to 4.8 millimeters per year (mm/yr), and subsidence continues today. This land subsidence helps explain why the region has the highest rates of sea-level rise on the Atlantic Coast of the United States. Data indicate that land subsidence has been responsible for more than half the relative sea-level rise measured in the region. Land subsidence increases the risk of flooding in low-lying areas, which in turn has important economic, environmental, and human health consequences for the heavily populated and ecologically important southern Chesapeake Bay region. The aquifer system in the region has been compacted by extensive groundwater pumping in the region at rates of 1.5- to 3.7-mm/yr; this compaction accounts for more than half of observed land subsidence in the region. Glacial isostatic adjustment, or the flexing of the Earth’s crust in response to glacier formation and melting, also likely contributes to land subsidence in the region.

https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1392/pdf/circ1392.pdf