Trump itching to fire the fed

Who here believes she's good with numbers?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...302270-5d0d-11e9-9625-01d48d50ef75_story.html
‘She’s very good with numbers’: Trump says he considered his daughter Ivanka to lead the World Bank

President Trump considered nominating his eldest daughter, Ivanka Trump, to be president of the World Bank in part because “she’s very good with numbers,” according to a new interview published Friday.

Speaking to the Atlantic, Trump lavished praise on his daughter, a 37-year-old White House adviser, and suggested she would be suitable for other administration positions, including U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.

“She’s a natural diplomat,” Trump said. “She would’ve been great at the United Nations, as an example.”

Asked why he didn’t nominate her, Trump replied: “If I did, they’d say nepotism, when it would’ve had nothing to do with nepotism. But she would’ve been incredible.”

Trump added: “I even thought of Ivanka for the World Bank. . . . She would’ve been great at that because she’s very good with numbers.”

Who here cares?
 
Anyone that cares about cronyism/nepotism/corruption.

You mean anyone that (suddenly) cares about cronyism/nepotism/corruption (now that Trump is the President). Because this shit has been going on for a while now. It's only recently (interestingly enough, since you guys lost the White House) that you guys have shown interest.
 
You mean anyone that (suddenly) cares about cronyism/nepotism/corruption (now that Trump is the President). Because this shit has been going on for a while now. It's only recently (interestingly enough, since you guys lost the White House) that you guys have shown interest.
Repeating a lie won't make it true
 
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/d...-be-as-much-as-10000-points-higher-2019-04-14
Donald Trump: The stock market should be as much as 10,000 points higher

Lately, he’s been blasting the Federal Reserve for raising rates, and he’s steadily urged the central banks to revert to the policies that supported the market during the last crisis, including the resumption of the Fed’s bond-buying program.

“I would say in terms of quantitative tightening, it should actually now be quantitative easing,” he said last week. “You would see a rocket ship.”

On Sunday, he put numbers to that potential “rocket ship” rally:

‘If the Fed had done its job properly, which it has not, the Stock Market would have been up 5000 to 10,000 additional points, and GDP would have been well over 4% instead of 3%... with almost no inflation. Quantitative tightening was a killer, should have done the exact opposite!’
 
Are you sure?
tumblr_n2ykouQjF31ql56ddo1_500.gif
 
Orange man good . . . . . black man baad,



couldn't resist.:D.

Or we can judge both Presidents - all Presidents, on their accomplishments and hold them to the same standards. I understand this is a foreign concept to the "support your team no matter what" party, but that's how we should work.
 
Back
Top