It's a question exGOP is conspicuously avoiding.
If Michelle was transgender, I'm wondering if that could be considered porn in the White House.
Do you consider all transgenders a form of porn?
It's a question exGOP is conspicuously avoiding.
If Michelle was transgender, I'm wondering if that could be considered porn in the White House.
Trump only watches transgender porn?
I expect a lot of those are chicks who don't shave their legs really... Sarah Sanders... makes so much sense now.
Do you consider all transgenders a form of porn?
"Chicks". Isn't that a pornographic term?
No, it is just from chicas, girls and chicos boys.
I'm amazed to hear that a biologically infertile Michelle married Barrak, faked scores of baby bump pictures, secretly adopted kids who look like them now, all so many years before knowing Barrak was a shoe in for president when nobody had heard of him.
They did an amazing job with the 2008 recovery but with that superhuman foresight they should have done a lot better!
Actually chicks, the way you used it, is a male supremacistic term that sees girls as commodities. That is a fetish in the pornographic industry.
Its really not. I guess your are enjoying The Handmaid's Tale as much as Breaking Bad though? Maybe more.
No it really is used in North American vernacular by posers who wish to be seen as alpha males who are able to access girls as anyone else would access commodities.
The rule of thumb is anyone who uses the term can barely access one female, while those who don't use the term are more likely to have access to multiple females.
The term has been around since the sixties, having nothing to do with the way South Americans might uses the term chicas or chicos.
Here, it is derogatory, as those males who use the term wish to be seen as supreme (hence male supremacy).