Trump Is Right About Birth Citizenship
- Thread starter AAAintheBeltway
- Start date
That anyone could think that he is worse than Obama tells us just how far rational thought has devolved.
I was pointing out IBD polls it pretty straight up, not like their editorial page.
I understand their editorial page is not a comfortable read for people who prefer soros sponsored blogs like pro publica.
I understand their editorial page is not a comfortable read for people who prefer soros sponsored blogs like pro publica.
You know Jem, fhl didn't get it, so I let it rest. But there is probably no more to the far right financial publication than O'Neil's IBD --surely that old windbag is dead by now.. That bag of self promoting vomit reminds me very much of the Donald in fact. But the Donald is well to the left of O'Neil. On second thought, I guess O'Neil isn't left or right anymore; he is more less ambidextrous.
Do you think that after the election the Supreme court will be asked to take up the 14th Amendment citizenship clause? Won't that be fun! I kinda hope they do because I know the arguments on both sides would be entertaining. Surely Scalia will argue from the originalist stance. But where would Kennedy or Roberts be?
That Rasmuffin poll, in case you didn't look at it yet, was about who the Republicans think will get the nomination; apparently they think it will be the Donald -- Oh, I guess that was the Gallup poll.. Not sure I ever looked at the Rasmuffin poll. (I usually don't look at the stuff fhl posts.) I imagine the opposition party, whoever they are, is licking their chops once again. This will be much more fun than Palen, because Palen was only a side show, The Donald is the feature attraction. I can't wait to see the ads, Saturday night live, and all those Mexican illegals who have worked for "his people" coming out of the woodwork like a band of midnight cockroach raiders!
Oops, I've already forgotten how to spell her name. It's supposed to be Palin, right. I had to look it up. How quickly we forget the names of the absurd. Just their absurdity stays with us. I'll forget how to spell her name, but I'll never forget that she could see Russia from her back yard and spent her Republican Party campaign money on clothes.. ... Who was it she ran with now, oh that's right, it was that nice fellow from Arizona. The one with the puffy cheek... the one who wasn't very good at killing people from high altitude and let himself get captured. ...or so the Donald says... My advice to the Donald, assuming he gets the nomination, is to bone up on how to spell "potato" or else stay away from grade school spelling bees.
Propublica does not do editorials. They are an investigative reporting outfit. The inability to distinguish may have to do with wearing ideologically tinted glasses which cause everything to be seen as ideologically slanted either left or right.
I personally never found IBD's editorials uncomfortable, just very out of touch with reality. But I haven't read IBD for years. I didn't know they were still in business until now. Do you subscribe?
Last edited:
a distinction without a difference. Propublica is in part funded by George Soros and it was founded by a big democrat donars. All you need to know is how slanted its coverage was of the IRS targeting conservatives. No straight up honest broker reporting could have created the pile of detritus they authored.
IBD --- I did subscribe until yesterday. But not for the editorials.
I ended my subscription because I was not seeing enough follow through in the stocks I was picking using their screens. Not losing money but wasting a lot of time. Perhaps my timing was off.
IBD --- I did subscribe until yesterday. But not for the editorials.
I ended my subscription because I was not seeing enough follow through in the stocks I was picking using their screens. Not losing money but wasting a lot of time. Perhaps my timing was off.
Last edited:
About half of immigrant households on welfare, report says
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...useholds-on-welfare-report-says/?intcmp=hpbt3
Roughly half of immigrant households in the United States receive at least one form of welfare, with that number rising to 73 percent for immigrant households from Central America and Mexico, a new report released Wednesday said.
The report, released by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) – a group that calls for lower levels of immigration – falls in the middle of a fiery political debate on the presidential campaign trail over immigration policies. The report says immigrant households use welfare at much higher rates than the American-born population. The study used Census Bureau Survey of Income and Program Participation data.
(More at above url)
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...useholds-on-welfare-report-says/?intcmp=hpbt3
Roughly half of immigrant households in the United States receive at least one form of welfare, with that number rising to 73 percent for immigrant households from Central America and Mexico, a new report released Wednesday said.
The report, released by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) – a group that calls for lower levels of immigration – falls in the middle of a fiery political debate on the presidential campaign trail over immigration policies. The report says immigrant households use welfare at much higher rates than the American-born population. The study used Census Bureau Survey of Income and Program Participation data.
(More at above url)
No-skilled, illiterate, broke immigrants are a drain on the system. How could they be otherwise? Proper immigration is all about being selective - you want the best, brightest, skilled and rich to immigrant. Doing the opposite is just an exercise in collective charity, which exerts a huge financial and social cost on the rest of us.