Noted. We'll see.You're wrong as usual. The movement and Trump will only gain strength from here and his leverage is extremely high. You Dems and Liberal Republicans just don't get it and likely never will.
#AnotherFalseBuy1Sell2Prediction
Noted. We'll see.You're wrong as usual. The movement and Trump will only gain strength from here and his leverage is extremely high. You Dems and Liberal Republicans just don't get it and likely never will.
No.---you have the ass end of the stick. The thread title was about the formation of a 3rd party, not about Trump running as a 3rd party.Exactly ... Trump's brain can't see logic.Let's see of the GOP senate can.
Again, you're incorrect.No.---you have the ass end of the stick. The thread title was about the formation of a 3rd party, not about Trump running as a 3rd party.
Wrong. Trump hasn't made any quote. You are quoting another member's opinion or an editor's opinion when talking about running as a 3rd party. The leverage that is purported by the OP and then the article later in the thread talk about "starting" or "forming" a 3rd party. Trump can do that whether convicted unconstitutionally or not. Your logic argument has swiss cheese holes in it.Again, you're incorrect.
My post was a response to the Trump quote, that I quoted ... regardless the thread title.
True, and intentional. I corrected my syntax to make that clear. The opinion used "Trump," not "I." It's clearly an opinion, which I agreed with straight away by saying "Exactly ..."Wrong. Trump hasn't made any quote. You are quoting another member's opinion or an editor's opinion when talking about running as a 3rd party.
Exactly ... and I agreed with the the OP.The leverage that is purported by the OP
Yes. While Trump probably doesn't even know if he'll run, my post was mainly concerning that possibility, however:and then the article later in the thread talk about "starting" or "forming" a 3rd party.
Golf and dealing with who thwarted him: this is how Trump has spent his time since leaving the White House
It has been five days since Donald Trump left the White House. Since then he has resided at his club Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida. There he spends his days playing golf and coming up with plans to deal with who once sabotaged him. Trump declined to attend the swearing-in of his successor Joe Biden in Washington DC on Wednesday. He left before dawn by helicopter to Joint Base Andrews, where he gave a farewell speech, and then flew on to Mar-a-Lago in Florida. Since then he has mainly focused on golfing.
The atmosphere in the exclusive club would not have been great since his arrival. According to historian Laurence Leamer - the author of Mar-a-Lago: Inside the Gates of Power at Donald Trump's Presidential Palace - many loyal members have quietly left since they no longer want to be associated with the former president. "Many of them didn't go there often anymore, because it's a desolate place," Leamer said on MSNBC news channel. “It is now a sad place for Trump to stay. It is no longer what it used to be. ”
Airplane
That some of his new neighbors also did not like to see him come, has already been shown. According to The Washington Post, they sent a letter to the city council and the secret service in which they made it clear that Trump is legally not allowed to live there permanently. Last weekend, a plane also flew over with some banners that read, among other things, that Trump was “the worst president ever”. It is not clear to what extent Trump is taking it to his heart.
In addition to golf, insiders say he is busy planning his political future. For example, he would play with the idea of founding a new party. He would like to put candidates in positions where Republicans who were not loyal to him in the past come up. Trump has already shown in recent weeks that he is still angry with a number of party representatives who dropped him after the storming of the Capitol on January 6, including Republican leader in the Senate Mitch McConnell and the number three of the Republican party in the House Speaker Liz Cheney. Trump is said to have told his advisers that he is popular enough to get them in the way. Threat Insiders also told The Washington Post that Trump's threat to create a new party wants to deter Republicans who want to vote in favor of his impeachment trial. After all, a third party could cost the Republicans a lot of votes.
Trump would also be furious with top virologist Anthony Fauci. In recent days, he has made it clear in several interviews that he is happy that Trump has disappeared from the scene and that he now works for President Biden. According to sources from news medium The Daily Beast, Trump would obsessively follow all TV interviews with Fauci in Mar-a-Lago and complain about how “incompetent” Fauci was and that he should have fired him when he could (something he has not the power for, because Fauci is not politically appointed).
Trump is also angry that he can no longer comment on Twitter, because his account has been indefinitely suspended after the riots at the Capitol. “He feels that many people are doing everything they can to bring down his legacy, out of hatred for who he is,” he said.
Your premise was a fallacy. You claimed that Trump's brain couldn't understand logic, but the logic was presented in a false and twisted manner. You responded to this--True, and intentional. I corrected my syntax to make that clear. The opinion used "Trump," not "I." It's clearly an opinion, which I agreed with straight away by saying "Exactly ..."
Exactly ... and I agreed with the the OP.
Yes. While Trump probably doesn't even know if he'll run, my post was mainly concerning that possibility, however:
If he starts a third party, it would still be in the best interest of the GOP if he didn't run. If he did run, he'd likely draw more votes from the GOP. So it's in the best interest of the GOP for him not to run ... and make that a certainty with a conviction.
Trump wants the GOP to believe that he can draw the same crowd, after four years, without twitter, and even if he weren't running. I doubt Trump actually believes that.
You correctly conclude it's time for me to move on; but you got the reason wrong.Your premise was a fallacy. You claimed that Trump's brain couldn't understand logic, but the logic was presented in a false and twisted manner. You responded to this--
"So the choice is vote to acquit to stop Trump from running as a third party candidate or vote to convict so he can't run as either a third party or GOP candidate."
------and this opinion assumes Trump is running as a 3rd party, when in fact the discussion in this thread and in the article was about Trump forming a party. ----You've been defeated on this subject of logic. It's time to go to something else.
he has a brain???![]()