Trump going after the right to peacefully assemble

I don't even have cable or regular TV stations. I'm "unplugged", and spend less than 3 hours a week watching stuff (mostly Netflix). Yet, I saw the 2 minute highlight video that made me want to vomit.

It's there if you don't hide from it.
Remaining willfully ignorant is a core element of radical leftism. Who is gathering in large numbers without permits? Who is screaming at people in the hallways and elevators? Who is running people out of restaurants? Who is marching down highways and blocking streets? Who is burning cars, buildings, and looting businesses? Who is clawing like some possessed lunatic at the doors of the Supreme Court?
All intellectually honest people know who the real threat is to a civil society. Antifa, BLM, and now radicalized feminists have entered the realm of domestic terrorism, and need to be dealt with accordingly.
 
I thing you (and the left-wing) media are creating your own bizarre narrative about the second amendment comment. It was not a call to kill his opponent -- he was urging those who support gun rights to make sure Clinton was not elected.

So tell me again where Trump directly stated that his opponents should be killed or murdered.

I thing you (and the right-wing) media are creating your own bizarre narrative about the teacher's comment. It was not a call to kill Kavanaugh -- she was expressing her frustration of the Judge's confirmation using a sardonic comment.
 
I thing you (and the right-wing) media are creating your own bizarre narrative about the teacher's comment. It was not a call to kill Kavanaugh -- she was expressing her frustration of the Judge's confirmation using a sardonic comment.

Good luck with your assertion.

Looks like this idiot of a teacher is about to learn a lesson that “free speech” has consequences as they shortly will be out of a job and lose their teaching credentials.

Yet in the meantime you can’t provide a single example of Trump directly saying his opponents should be killed or murdered - you only can re-direct the thread. Try answering the question.
 
https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-spee...on-seeks-stifle-protests-near-white-house-and

Now, the Trump administration proposes to dramatically limit the right to demonstrate near the White House and on the National Mall, including in ways that would violate court orders that have stood for decades. The proposal would close 80 percent of the White House sidewalk, put new limits on spontaneous demonstrations, and open the door to charging fees for protesting.
upload_2018-10-10_9-9-25.jpeg
 
I thing you (and the left-wing) media are creating your own bizarre narrative about the second amendment comment. It was not a call to kill his opponent -- he was urging those who support gun rights to make sure Clinton was not elected.

So tell me again where Trump directly stated that his opponents should be killed or murdered.
You are a brain dead True Believer. Everyone knew what Trump meant. There is no nuance to the man. He might not have been serious, but he fucking said it. The man who is now your president.

Brain dead. You. Him. Both.
 
Last edited:
I thing you (and the left-wing) media are creating your own bizarre narrative about the second amendment comment. It was not a call to kill his opponent -- he was urging those who support gun rights to make sure Clinton was not elected.

So tell me again where Trump directly stated that his opponents should be killed or murdered.

Exactly. He was saying that those who supported the 2nd amendment could do something about it by voting.

Now, the above tweet saying that someone should take one for the team and kill Kavanaugh....

It's a little hard to misinterpret that one.
 
Good luck with your assertion.

Looks like this idiot of a teacher is about to learn a lesson that “free speech” has consequences as they shortly will be out of a job and lose their teaching credentials.

Yet in the meantime you can’t provide a single example of Trump directly saying his opponents should be killed or murdered - you only can re-direct the thread. Try answering the question.

GWB, you can always tell when you get Ricter into a corner, because he'll use certain "tactics" in his response. Bonafide Ricter debate tactics. For example, see how he latched on to the exact phrase you used (with the spelling error repeated) and reversing it completely to try to turn it around on you?
 
Back
Top