Trump gets another TIME cover

This would have been a better cover pic for fake news Time.

DgLrwSnUEAE10rN.jpg
 
Fake news but all you babydaddy wannabies go for it.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-face-child-separation-crisis-speaks-out.html

'Denis said his wife and daughter were never separated by border control agents and remain together.'
LOL
Let’s see if the media reports this.

Shit, anyone want to go to a Kindergarden on the first day of school to film some kids crying when being dropped off by their Mommies?
You will probably find the leftist ET foreigner pedos there wanking it in a bush.
 
Over the course of time , down through the few hundred thousands of years hominids have walked the face of the Earth, many explanations, metaphysical and physical, must have been set forth, the vast majority having been lost to time because they were demonstrably wrong. A few were so spectacularly wrong that they survived as curiosities even the age of enlightenment and the dawn of modern science in the 18th century up through the golden age of science of the late 19th and early 20th century up to 1929. Your idea may fall in the latter category, but I personally am not willing to dismiss it entirely. It's rather unique and should be considered further. The first conjecture may have something to it. Most likely, the second is wrong. It is much more likely, i would think, that Anthropology and Sociology are components of what replaced classical philosophy rather than being subsets of it. For example, classical philosophy was completely replaced by science after 1929. the entire process took roughly 200 years. Very slow at first and then at breakneck velocity from the late 19th century until 1929 when Chadwick discovered the last particle of ordinary matter, the neutron.
So don't give up. You may not be entirely insane.

I just don't consider anthropology or sociology to be valid starting, or ending points in the quest for knowledge, which is what "the love of wisdom" means to me.

If you can think of a better word for understanding, and then achieving some mastery over the difference between knowledge and faith, let me know and I'll consider it.

I consider science the observation of persistent phenomena. But again, backing up to see the forest, persistent phenomena involving any sized particle is still a product of faith, as it worms it's way through a compromised mind.

As an expression of a compromised mind, I consider material phenomenon to be an expression of insanity. My claim to sanity rests on that observation.

Persistent phenomena is merely a show of how faith is able to maintain itself, beyond the span of several human life-spans, even several thousand.

Said another way, a compromised mind can remain irrational longer than man can maintain his solvency.

By persistent phenomena, I mean things that are changing, slow enough that man and his science thinks they are real and permanent.

2+2=4. But that will change.
 
Last edited:
I've said, all study of physical/material world phenomenon is a study of the effects of faith upon a compromised mind. A compromised mind is the study of psychology, which produces mankind, from whence comes the study of sociology. Anthropology is about the changing of matter.
You may force me no to conclude that I was wrong. Both halves of you are insane.
 
I consider science the observation of persistent phenomena. But again, backing up to see the forest, persistent phenomena involving any sized particle is still a product of faith, as it worms it's way through a compromised mind.
Oh. there is the difference. The point where you go horribly wrong in your thinking. I have no time to go into it now . but I will return to this. I'll just tantalize by saying that you've only got half of science when you write, "I consider science the observation of persistent phenomena." That's both perceptive and absolutely correct, but its not complete. And if you don't realize that, then you will draw your conclusion incorrectly, as anyone would if they did not recognize the important missing component. I'll tell you what's missing later. Have to run.
 
You may force me no to conclude that I was wrong. Both halves of you are insane.

The idea that there is a sane Self, and the appearance of an insane self is the beginning of wisdom on the quest for knowledge.

A mind, divided against itself at the core level of identity, is compromized, and while this condition persists, cannot remain sane (a house divided against itself must fall).

At the anthro-sociological level, we call people who are divided in their identity "bi-polar", and or "schizophrenic". We consider this to be an illness.


Every human is suffering from just such an identity crises, some more obviously than others.

Philosophy, the love of wisdom or the quest for knowledge is an attempt to reach back to a "true self" with the expectation that it's sanity is still intact, and able to heal the psychological divide.

It is the insane self that is controlling all material phenomena through its faith (not it's knowledge).
 
Last edited:
Oh. there is the difference. The point where you go horribly wrong in your thinking. I have no time to go into it now . but I will return to this. I'll just tantalize by saying that you've only got half of science when you write, "I consider science the observation of persistent phenomena." That's both perceptive and absolutely correct, but its not complete. And if you don't realize that, then you will draw your conclusion incorrectly, as anyone would if they did not recognize the important missing component. I'll tell you what's missing later. Have to run.

In a world such as I have described, sanity is measured by ones seriousness in persistent phenomenon.

By calling exGOPer a serioso, I'm saying he is insane almost beyond repair. It's this seriousness which makes the land of imagination and faith into a living hell.

Never take yourself, nor your built-in sense of supremacy (all humans suffer from serious supremacy syndrome) too seriously.

This is mainly why I consider the histrionics of the left to be repugnant. Never go full serious. Even the comedians on the left have gone full serious.

Full serious is the sad sign of reaching supremacy, up an insane incline, at the top of a superstitious mountain called faith. Full faith is the epitome of insanity.
 

Fake ass news!

Father of girl on front cover speaks out. So the father has a good job. The mother took the daughter against the wishes of the father and the mother just wanted to move to the US.

"But Hernandez said that he had heard through family members that his wife and daughter had not actually been separated."

In the US, would that be considered kidnapping?

"He revealed that his wife had previously mentioned her wish to go to the United States for a 'better future' but did not tell him nor any of their family members that she was planning to make the trek."

'I didn't support it. I asked her, why? Why would she want to put our little girl through that? But it was her decision at the end of the day.'

'I never got the chance to say goodbye to my daughter and now all I can do is wait', he said, adding that he hopes they are either granted political asylum or are sent back home.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-face-child-separation-crisis-speaks-out.html

EXCLUSIVE: 'They're together and they're safe.' Father of Honduran two-year-old who became the face of the family separation crisis when she was photographed in tears as her mother was searched by U.S. border control speaks out

In an exclusive interview with DailyMail.com, Hernandez, who lives in Puerto Cortes, Honduras, says that he was told yesterday that his wife and child are being detained at a family residential center in Texas but are together and are doing 'fine[bold mine].'
 
Last edited:
Back
Top