Trump gets another TIME cover

[Good1]

So it doesn't matter what subset one has studied since everything is knowledge?

Subsets are like trees. A philosopher stands back and sees the forest, through eyes of knowledge, a forest that grows from the soil of faith, which is the essence of the domain of imagination (the total opposite of knowledge's domain of reality).

As a narrow minded bigot, you are always liked a triggered street dog, barking up the wrong tree.

 

[exGOPer]

Subsets are like trees, a philosopher stands back and sees the forest, through eyes of knowledge, a forest that grows from the soil of faith, which is the essence of the domain of imagination (the total opposite of knowledge's domain of reality).

As a narrow minded bigot, you are always liked a triggered street dog, barking up the wrong tree.

This is the kind of bullshit that got Trump elected, philistines pretending to be men of wisdom and gas lighting meaning of words. Socrates hated Sophists for a reason.

 

[Good1]

This is the kind of bullshit that got Trump elected, philistines pretending to be men of wisdom and gas lighting meaning of words. Socrates hated Sophists for a reason.

Pretty sure Socrates tore apart those who relied on avoidance of argument via ad hominem attacks like this.

You don't even have the vocabulary to cross-examine anything I've said, English being second language to you.

 

[exGOPer]

Pretty sure Socrates tore apart those who relied on avoidance of argument via ad hominem attacks like this.

You don't even have the vocabulary to cross-examine anything I've said, English being second language to you.

Calling a philistine a philistine is not ad hominem. There is nothing to cross examine since you make up shit as you go along.

 

[Good1]

Calling a philistine a philistine is not ad hominem. There is nothing to cross examine since you make up shit as you go along.

No these are things I've been saying for a long time without deviating in consistency (all sub-statements in harmony, free of cognitive dissonance).

I've said, all study of physical/material world phenomenon is a study of the effects of faith upon a compromised mind. A compromised mind is the study of psychology, which produces mankind, from whence comes the study of sociology. Anthropology is about the changing of matter. Philosophy sees changing matter as the effect of a changing (compromised) mind.

 

[exGOPer]

No these are things I've been saying for a long time without deviating in consistency (all sub-statements in harmony, free of cognitive dissonance).

I've said, all study of physical/material world phenomenon is a study of the effects of faith upon a compromised mind. A compromised mind is the study of psychology, which produces mankind, from whence comes the study of sociology. Anthropology is about the changing of matter. Philosophy sees changing matter as the effect of a changing (compromised) mind.

Again, who cares what you say? Show me a trained sociologist who agrees with your nonsense.

 

[Good1]

Again, who cares what you say? Show me a trained sociologist who agrees with your nonsense.

I could show you two, of whom I learned a lot. But I don't mention books or names.

 

[Good1]

Again, who cares what you say? Show me a trained sociologist who agrees with your nonsense.

As a rule of thumb, people don't care about knowledge, only their faith. People being the product of faith, as opposed to the product of knowledge.

The only people who care are those who are weary from carrying the weight of faith on their shoulders for millenia.

You are not yet weary.

 

[exGOPer]

As a rule of thumb, people don't care about knowledge, only their faith. People being the product of faith, as opposed to the product of knowledge.

The only people who care are those who are weary from carrying the weight of faith on their shoulders for millenia.

You are not yet weary.

Nobody cares for anything other than self-interest, what you call 'knowledge' is just to show off, to say to someone that I KNOW YOU DONT so I am better than you. Knowledge has no weight, the only thing one can know is that one knows nothing. And the guy you support is the exact opposite of that state of being.

 

[Good1]

Nobody cares for anything other than self-interest, what you call 'knowledge' is just to show off, to say to someone that I KNOW YOU DONT so I am better than you. Knowledge has no weight, the only thing one can know is that one knows nothing. And the guy you support is the exact opposite of that state of being.

I would categorize Trump as a creature of faith, but you no less. On the field of faith, which is always a battlefield, I'll back the least bigoted, and go against the biggest bully (you and your comrades).

Caring about your faith and caring about your self-interest are the same thing.

When you start caring about knowledge, instead of your faith, you do/must pass through a disinterest with identifying as/with any race, as well as a disinterest in how your ideological/political, and bigotal/religio faith maintains your unique, supremacistic, identity.

In short, knowledge will destroy your current identity.

Again, you must be weary of the effects of faith to invite this destruction.