Trump gets another TIME cover

WeToddDid2 said:
I didn't promise anything. I said I would want to have a civil debate. You have proven previously that you don't want to have a civil debate. I am more than willing.

You went completely off topic once you were proven wrong. That is intellectually dishonest.
More...

I was proven wrong on what point? I pointed out that the notorious tabloid DailyMail is quoting a disgruntled father who never spoke to the victims in the story, doesnt elaborate on who 'told' him that they are together - never claims someone told him the mother and child were never separated either.

So what I have been proven wrong on? ON what point was I intellectually dishonest.

Can you be specific?
 
exGOPer said:
What are you blabbering about, stick to the topic or don't respond at all.
More...

The tripic is about how WeToddDid2 is kicking your ass because you just couldn't wait till 4 AM to get your talking points from your billionaire paymasters.

Here, I found video footage of you, tryina back up your billionaire paymasters, but ain't got the vocabulary to even make a cohesive argument without yo 4 AM how-to-talk points.

Go to 2:30 in the video footage that shows you comin ta back yo billionaire paymasters:

 
exGOPer said:
I was proven wrong on what point? I pointed out that the notorious tabloid DailyMail is quoting a disgruntled father who never spoke to the victims in the story, doesnt elaborate on who 'told' him that they are together - never claims someone told him the mother and child were never separated either.

So what I have been proven wrong on? ON what point was I intellectually dishonest.

Can you be specific?
More...
exGOPer said:
All that repetition and not a word about how he found out. That's Daily Mail for you.
More...
Now we will see some more intellectual dishonesty and deflection from you.

You said, "not one word about how he found out." That is clearly wrong by any measure. But, you will refuse to admit it. I know you will come back, spin it, and deflect with where are the specifics. He didn't give the address, name and phone number of the family member he spoke with. Regardless, you were wrong. There were several words with how he found out.
 
Good1 said:
The tripic is about how WeToddDid2 is kicking your ass because you just couldn't wait till 4 AM to get your talking points from your billionaire paymasters.

Here, I found video footage of you, tryina back up your billionaire paymasters, but ain't got the vocabulary to even make a cohesive argument without yo 4 AM how-to-talk points.

Go to 2:30 in the video footage that shows you comin ta back yo billionaire paymasters:

More...
That was awesome. What other business can a CEO talk to his clientele in that manner?
 
Last edited:
WeToddDid2 said:
Now we will see some more intellectual dishonesty and deflection from you.

You said, "not one word about how he found out." That is clearly wrong by any measure. But, you will refuse to admit it. I know you will come back, spin it, and deflect with where are the specifics. He didn't give the address, name and phone number of the family member he spoke with. Regardless, you were wrong. There were several words with how he found out.
More...

How do you know it's a family member? Did I ask for personal details? I just want to know WHO he talked to, WHO told him? You don't know either but you are gonna throw a bunch in words to obfuscate the question and declare victory.
 
Good1 said:
The tripic is about how WeToddDid2 is kicking your ass because you just couldn't wait till 4 AM to get your talking points from your billionaire paymasters.

Here, I found video footage of you, tryina back up your billionaire paymasters, but ain't got the vocabulary to even make a cohesive argument without yo 4 AM how-to-talk points.

Go to 2:30 in the video footage that shows you comin ta back yo billionaire paymasters:

More...

Yes, WWE footage with known fraudsters, only geniuses watch this.

Tell me something, do you know you are retarded?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top