Those are business trips, not vacation you imbecile.
The only imbeciles are those who think Trump needs to go here 3 times a month for business.
Those are business trips, not vacation you imbecile.
The only imbeciles are those who think Trump needs to go here 3 times a month for business.
![]()

If Obamas golf trips for 12 months cost the same as one month of Trump and family trips they probably would have.
The only imbeciles are those who think Trump needs to go here 3 times a month for business.
![]()
Why? Business requires entertainment and putting the party on the other side of the negotiation table in a setting that lowers his/her defenses or makes them more amiable. Many company do similar type things. If they get results, it's worth it.
No other President needed to spend anywhere near the amount on government business entertainment as President Trump does.What were the needs and results of Trump going to Mar a Lago 3 times in a month?What are the results for the taxpayers paying for secret service protection for his sons flying around the world for the trump corporation business?What are the results for the taxpayers paying 500,000 a day because Melania doesn't want to stay at The White House?
First, saying "no other President" doesn't support your argument for several reasons. Beyond Obama, $$ spend on a parity basis is worthless as inflation takes hold the further back you go. Additionally, saying "no other President" is irrelevant as Trump ran on a platform promising things "no other President" ever promised.
Second, why don't we see if he achieves results with his actions? I think if he can get 600,000 jobs from Japanese corporations setting up shop here in the US, it's worth a 13mm spend.
The guy has been in office one whole month. I get that you folks are pissed off that you lost the election. We were too, 4 years back. Let it go and let's see what we can do moving forward.
Ok .Lets say hosting the Japanese PM at Mar A Lago is acceptable(even though The White House is quite nice ),What about the other 2 times? What about taxpayers paying secret service protection for his grown children conducting private business?What about taxpayers paying 500,000 a day because Mrs Trump doesn't want to be at The White House?
I'd have to understand the reasons behind the decisions. But on first glance, I am forced to agree with you - the optics do not look good (as I said originally).