Yes we all know you don’t want America to win. A win for America is good for Trump. Leftards hate when America wins.
Trump ‘Doesn’t Have Skill Set Or Experience’ For China Deal, Fears Farm Union Head
- Thread starter Tony Stark
- Start date
this is what delusion looks like. Every single thing I've stated is corraborated
Wrong.I want America to win,but Trump isn't winning.Trump is losing with China.
Trump is losing with Iran-shooting down US military equipment,restarted their nuclear program,attacking Saudi Arabia
Trump is losing with North Korea-still has nukes,still building nukes,still improving and testing missiles.
Trump is losing with The American people-lowest first term average approval rating ever,never had a 50% approval rating,lost 2016 by 3 million votes,in 2018 lost The House by 10 million votes(the most ever)lost 23 out of 33 Senate races
Trump is losing with the deficit-increased the deficit from 600 billion to 1 trillion
Trump is losing with uniting the country-He is the most divisive president ever and the country is more divided than ever
Trump is losing with the world-most of the world hate him and so do most US allies.
Trump is losing with illegal immigration-no wall,illegal immigration at all time highs under his presidency.
Only in the mind of someone stupid enough to be a Trump supporter is Trump winning.
Not so sure...
Trump is sacrificing the people who produce food for our nation, for folks who don't want Nike sneakers copied.
Which is more important. Food to eat, or having exclusive rights to make a widget and profit from it?
Latest blurb from the cow side...
"The WSJ article today reminds everyone that the African Swine Fever is an monumental event in the world of red meats. The repercussions will be felt by the increased prices of all meats including beef and poultry. Futures responded to the WSJ article and to favorable bullish news from the cattle on feed report. The need of some Asian countries for additional meat supplies is immediate and no matter where they acquire the meat, it will impact world prices. Asians are finicky eaters and it may be the case that they might prefer to switch from pork to beef given the perception that pork might be disease ridden.
Live cattle sold at $101-104 with the higher prices paid in the north. Dressed prices ranged from $160-165 with the high end selling at week's end. Some over the top sales were reported in the south. The folks at Mandatory Price reporting still refuse to report prices or basis premiums to "over the top" cattle on Monday handing a welcome favor to the beef packers by making sure the prices are not transparent. This week's sales prices improved Friday as packers find sellers reluctant to accept steady prices with earlier in the week.
In a new twist on the Chinese trade wars, a Chinese delegation was scheduled to travel to Montana and Nebraska this weekend to view some of the agricultural products they would be purchasing. They cancelled the trip at the last minute claiming scheduling difficulties. Behind the cancellation was a backstory. The Chinese were prepared to move forward immediately with the purchase of ag products and let negotiations continue on other issues like tariffs and intellectual property. The Chinese need for ag products is urgent and the Trump administration reminded them a complete agreement is necessary -- not to allow cherry picking...
*shrugs*
Good thing Barr decide to redact all those intelligence tidbits huh? Remember how I mentioned corruption?
When Rep. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) asked if the decision not to bring charges of conspiracy against members of the Trump campaign “does not mean your investigation failed to turn up evidence of conspiracy,” Mueller responded: "That is correct."
Welch then listed off several findings from Mueller's investigation that he considered examples of such conspiracy, including former campaign chairman Paul Manafort giving private polling information to the Russians, the summer 2016 Trump Tower meeting arranged by Donald Trump Jr. and President Trump calling on Russia to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails.
Welch also cited information from former deputy campaign chair Rick Gates in Mueller’s report indicating the campaign devised messaging around WikiLeaks’ releases of hacked Democratic emails.
Asked if the 2016 election had established “a new normal… that is going to apply to future campaigns” in terms of accepting assistance from foreign individuals or governments, Mueller said: “I hope this is not the new normal, but I fear it is.”
Mueller also agreed with Welch that “there would be no repercussions for Russia if they did this again.”
https://www.justsecurity.org/63838/guide-to-the-mueller-reports-findings-on-collusion/
1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.
2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.
3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.
4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.
5. Trump Campaign chairman Manafort expected Trump’s winning the presidency would mean Deripaska would want to use Manafort to advance Deripaska’s interests in the United States and elsewhere.
6. Trump Tower meeting: (1) On receiving an email offering derogatory information on Clinton coming from a Russian government official, Donald Trump Jr. “appears to have accepted that offer;” (2) members of the Campaign discussed the Trump Tower meeting beforehand; (3) Donald Trump Jr. told the Russians during the meeting that Trump could revisit the issue of the Magnitsky Act if elected.
7. A Trump Campaign official told the Special Counsel he “felt obliged to object” to a GOP Platform change on Ukraine because it contradicted Trump’s wishes; however, the investigation did not establish that Gordon was directed by Trump.
8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.
9. Trump requested campaign affiliates to get Clinton’s emails, which resulted in an individual apparently acting in coordination with the Campaign claiming to have successfully contacted Russian hackers.
10. The Trump Campaign—and Trump personally—appeared to have advanced knowledge of future WikiLeaks releases.
11. The Trump Campaign coordinated campaign-related public communications based on future WikiLeaks releases.
12. Michael Cohen, on behalf of the Trump Organization, brokered a secret deal for a Trump Tower Moscow project directly involving Putin’s inner circle, at least until June 2016.
13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.
14. During the presidential transition, in coordination with other members of the Transition Team, Michael Flynn spoke with the Russian Ambassador to prevent a tit for tat Russian response to the Obama administration’s imposition of sanctions for election interference; the Russians agreed not to retaliate saying they wanted a good relationship with the incoming administration
What is hilarious isn't that you think there was some corruption somewhere in the Trump campaign or administration, but that you deny there was - at the very least - equal corruption in the Hillary campaign and Obama administration.
That is what makes your comments so easily dismissed. You're partisan and partial, and thus, hypocritical.
What's hilarious is you have buyer's remorse over your vote and have to grasp at any straw to equivocate a past presidency and has-been politicians to this disaster. That makes you desperate and thus an idioit.
Buyer's remorse over my vote would indicate I regret voting for Trump. I've stated repeatedly that I would do it all over again. What I wish was that the choice wasn't between Trump and Hillary. So I'm not sure how this is buyer's remorse. Sounds like you're making more shit up.
Again.
Denial is not just a river in Egypt. Whatever happened to GWB? You're sounding more and more like him. Seems like him getting called out for every embarrassing whataboutism was too much for him to bear.