let me guess, antifaman bad?
Antifa is actually pretty stupid. They forgot to start fires in BC.
let me guess, antifaman bad?
let me guess, antifaman bad?
For those who think that BC and Alberta etc are too far north for forest fires, I have one question for you.
Can you spell "Fort McMurray Fire 2016?"
Temperature and latitude, how does it work?
I knew I should've guessed rakingMy explanation has nothing to do with ANTIFA or people deliberately setting fires.
I knew I should've guessed raking
It goes far beyond raking... it is about proper Forest Management. The bottom line is that Canada does forest management well and the U.S. states of California, Oregon, and Washington do a terrible job of forest management.
First let's provide some background.... For a lengthy period of time Canada has had a federal level all-encompassing Forest Management plan based on proper principles for eliminating uncontrolled forest fires, balancing forest growth & human recreation, and continual monitoring. Canada has created some of the best modeling tools for managing forests as part of this effort as well as a long term blue print for the next decade plus a comprehensive plan.
Some more information about the effort in Canada can be found at:
Canada Fire Management
https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/our-natural...-disturban/forest-fires/fire-management/13157
Blueprint for wildland fire science in Canada (2019-2029)
https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/our-natural...-wildland-fire-science-canada-2019-2029/21614
CANADIAN WILDLAND FIRE STRATEGY:A VISION FOR AN INNOVATIVE AND INTEGRATED APPROACH TO MANAGING THE RISKS
https://www.ccmf.org/pdf/Vision_E_web.pdf
The Fort McMurray Fire in 2016 triggered Canada to accelerate its forest management plan, accelerate modeling, and further improve its prevention strategy. These changes took Canada from being very good in forest management to being a world leader.
California serves as an excellent example of how to completely fail at forest management. Oregon and Washington have the same problems.
Let's take a look at California below...
The forest management problems in California can only be blamed on the state. For decades they rejected federal guidance and even refused to sign a forest management agreement until 2020.
Documents published in California recently by the state government are the best documentation of their complete failures. These documents include:
Community Wildfire Prevention & Mitigation Report prepared by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Feb 2019)
https://assets.documentcloud.org/do...re-2019-Community-Wildfire-Prevention-and.pdf
Improving California’s Forest and Watershed Management (California Legislative Analyst's Office) April 2018
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/3798
Fire on the Mountain: Rethinking Forest Management in the Sierra Nevada
https://lhc.ca.gov/report/fire-mountain-rethinking-forest-management-sierra-nevada
Reading these documents above provide a damning indictment of forest management in California showing that the fires can only be blamed on their poor forest management.
Some of the key problems in the California management of forests include:
In support of the above let's just take a look at one quote from the state government reports:
- The rejection of performing of clearing brush and controlled burns. This was driven by the green activist movement who viewed these acts as destroying nature. Sadly politicians supported these green activists.
- Not funding Forest Management - effectively the state failed to fund forest management even at a minimal level.
- Limits on timber harvesting which would have reduced the combustible material. This includes the absurd environmental permitting requirements in the state.
- Failure to have a forest management strategy beyond fire suppression as a reaction.
“As noted above, forest management practices and policies over the past several decades have (1) imposed limitations on timber harvesting, (2) emphasized fire suppression, and (3) instituted a number of environmental permitting requirements. These practices and policies have combined to constrain the amount of trees and other growth removed from the forest. This has significantly increased the density of trees in forests across the state, and particularly the prevalence of smaller trees and brush"
Forbes also published an article that critically outlined the forest management failures in California.
Wildfires Caused By Bad Environmental Policy Are Causing California Forests To Be Net CO2 Emitters
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckd...-forests-to-be-net-co2-emitters/#6204bf425e30
Only recently in 2020 California has signed a forest management strategy with the federal government and agreed to thin millions of acres of forest.
California Signs Shared Stewardship Agreement with the U.S. Forest Service to Manage Forests
https://www.sierrawave.net/62324-2/
To little, too late...
California fires: State, feds agree to thin millions of acres of forests
https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/08...s-agree-to-thin-millions-of-acres-of-forests/
The local press in California has also been critical over-time. Article outlines some history...
Fighting fire with fire: Should California burn its forests to protect against catastrophe?
https://www.sacbee.com/news/california/fires/article230481684.html
Sadly another impact of California's failed forest management strategy is the forced bankruptcy of their power provider PG&E from lawsuits related to 2018 forest fires. In the opinion of many observers the fault of the forest fires is not PG&E. California put regulations in place making it very difficult to clear vegetation & limbs near low tension power lines. California also never cleared brush under high tension power lines and would not allow PG&E to do so. At some point a power line will fall to the ground in a storm or spark - this is just part of normal electrical grid operations. Fires only occur when there is uncleared combustible vegetation in the vicinity of the power line. To hold PG&E responsible to the point of bankruptcy for the actions of the state of California is absurd in my opinion, and is an example of what is wrong with government in the state of California.
Yes its miraculous that the fire occurrences stop dead at the Canadian border, a man-made geographic demarcation. Apparently the lightning storms lacked the correct paperwork to make the border crossing and were turned back.Washington, Oregon and BC Canada have the same damn weather. If you have ever lived in any of these areas you would know that.
yeah, yeah...
![]()
Well if the cause of the fires in California, Oregon, and Washington is not forest management then we can only assume that either:
So which is it?
- Climate Change stops at the Canadian border
- Arsonists stop at the Canadian border.