Trump Cites Progress in Keeping Carrier Air Conditioning Plant in Indiana

I think we all agree that Milton Friedman conservative economics will prevail. And that's what we want. But, the goal has changed. It is no longer an America goal to buy the most stuff at the cheapest price to make our life better. For one thing, we don't need more stuff and we have plenty of money. What seems to be lacking in America is thriving communities. Poor people can now check their iphone to see if they got a text msg about that job interview while they are shopping at walmart. We haven't abandoned our belief that capitalism is the best path to prosperity for all worldwide, we've just expanded our view of the cost to include displaced workers. It's not a zero sum game. One new American job doesn't mean one less Chinese job, but if a job is going to be created, stand in line, Americans go first and the rest of the world can have the leftovers. In short, we as a people need a new American job more than we need a new Chinese iphone. That's all, and nobody has to write a new law to once again try to violate capitalism. We just needed a leader who is pro American business. Someone who will make Carrier an offer they can't refuse.
 
Air-conditioners are cutting edge now?



Your first paragraph doesn't make any sense and is completely unrelated. I gladly use my Chinese made and designed phone, the days when they just copied everything is passing. You think anyone would pay $2k for an iPhone if it was made in US?
A few nutjobs excluded.
You think an economy just produces the same crap as decades change? What sort of thinking is that? I hope we get even more productive, so the T-shirt factory will have 3 workers instead of 300...there's your "jobs".



They actually do, you just have to look around. If you just buy the cheapest shirt then of course it won't last. Then again European manufacturers have higher requirements when making stuff in China.
Fashion statements work to an extent only, the poorest (low + lower middle) won't keep buying pricey "made in America" shirts when the trend dies.

Pretty funny that on a trading related forum everyone is full of patriotism and economic irrationality.

Listen to me. Use google.

Chinese factories are investing heavily in robotic automation ...... at 5 DOLLARS AN HOUR LABOR RATES....

Should I draw a picture??
 
Cite your source. Your assertion as it stands is not true.

The actual truth is that the farmers in Georgia did not attract American laborers at the low wages they were offering for unskilled labor. It is not as if Americans took the farm jobs and decided to quit after one day of work. The cure for this is simple, farmers will need to increase the wages to attract domestic labor; this has happened multiple times in past American history.

Also the law in Georgia was primarily about the "high cost of providing public services to illegal residents: schooling, medical care, law enforcement and other publicly funded services." -- the side consequence was the driving away of illegal labor causing farmers to be 40% short of the laborers they needed to bring in the crops.

Here is an article with more information (whose angle is actually against the law in Georgia).

http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspi...rgias-immigration-law-backfires/#1cef8f34404a

So you want an isolated island type nation. Do you think they'd double or triple their wages and do the same to the produce? Who'd buy it, production would immediately move abroad.
Basic economics, do I have to explain more?

Funny how you right wing Americans are talking the same line as European leftist - EU is full of price controls and tariffs on things like garlic - as a result Chinese and Spanish garlic costs the same and it's the consumers who suffer.

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/ge...w-leading-to-crops-rotting-in-farmers-fields/

Also in Colorado:
http://reason.com/blog/2011/10/05/colorado-farmers-hire-locals-f

The Mexicans are expendable. It's the white and in Georgia also the black farmers we are trying to save. One farmer can plant and harvest 3,000 acres of row crops in a suit and tie with a computer. Fruits and vegetables are a problem and genetics are making even them adaptable to automation. But don't be surprised to see a shelf in the grocery store Real Tomatoes Grown in America, Harvested by Real Mexicans just the way it was when America was Great!

Shows you know nothing. Vast majority are harvested by hand and will be for the foreseeable future. How will automating harvester help the American worker? American workers are expendable too, clearly.

Let's be very clear, an iPhone will not cost $2K if it was manufactured in the U.S.

Only a few academics who support globalization have made this type of claim -- usually in support of grants provided by companies to assert this as a position to keep globalization in place.

When you actually contact manufacturers in the U.S. to get a detailed breakdown of the costs associated with manufacturing an iPhone in the U.S. -- they find that the cost is about 40% more .... which is in-line with other electronic products that have come back on-shore.

This means the consumer price for an iPhone would go up to approx $840 from $600 in the U.S.
Of course if you sign a cell phone contract, the consumer gets the phone for a mere couple hundred bucks.

iPhone is already having trouble at $600, it will be killed at $840. Interesting how you're so in love with the idea of higher prices for everything. Guess you must be making a lot if you don't care about your costs going up 40%.
 
So you want an isolated island type nation. Do you think they'd double or triple their wages and do the same to the produce? Who'd buy it, production would immediately move abroad.
Basic economics, do I have to explain more?

Funny how you right wing Americans are talking the same line as European leftist - EU is full of price controls and tariffs on things like garlic - as a result Chinese and Spanish garlic costs the same and it's the consumers who suffer.

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/ge...w-leading-to-crops-rotting-in-farmers-fields/

Also in Colorado:
http://reason.com/blog/2011/10/05/colorado-farmers-hire-locals-f



Shows you know nothing. Vast majority are harvested by hand and will be for the foreseeable future. How will automating harvester help the American worker? American workers are expendable too, clearly.



iPhone is already having trouble at $600, it will be killed at $840. Interesting how you're so in love with the idea of higher prices for everything. Guess you must be making a lot if you don't care about your costs going up 40%.
Tomatoes haven't been planted or harvested by Americans for a long time. The valley use to be full of them. Now tomatoes, all staked by hand as far as the eye can see, sea of red in Mexico. Peaches and pecans in Georgia are increasingly being harvested with new fangled machines. The last white American farm workers were the high school kids in Iowa who walked the beans in the summer when school was out. Now Monsanto takes care of all that. Automation does nothing to hurt American farm workers because there are none. Where the hell are you from anyway? You sure don't know much about America or Americans.

But I'll ignore your insults and try to explain it in language even a backwards capitalist can understand. We ARE making a lot of money and we don't need new stuff that costs less money and more jobs. We have seen that the final price is not the true price. We will pay the true price if it puts America back on top so we don't have to deal with European preservationists who only want to keep things the way they were. We instead want to make America Great Again! See the difference commie?
 
So you want an isolated island type nation. Do you think they'd double or triple their wages and do the same to the produce? Who'd buy it, production would immediately move abroad.
Basic economics, do I have to explain more?

Funny how you right wing Americans are talking the same line as European leftist - EU is full of price controls and tariffs on things like garlic - as a result Chinese and Spanish garlic costs the same and it's the consumers who suffer.

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/ge...w-leading-to-crops-rotting-in-farmers-fields/

Also in Colorado:
http://reason.com/blog/2011/10/05/colorado-farmers-hire-locals-f



Shows you know nothing. Vast majority are harvested by hand and will be for the foreseeable future. How will automating harvester help the American worker? American workers are expendable too, clearly.



iPhone is already having trouble at $600, it will be killed at $840. Interesting how you're so in love with the idea of higher prices for everything. Guess you must be making a lot if you don't care about your costs going up 40%.

First -- here is some more information on crops that are not harvested in the U.S. and the reasons they are left rotting in the field. Usually crops are left to rot because the price the farmer will get for them is so low that they are not worth harvesting. I will also note that the U.S. government pays farmers to let crops not be harvested as a form of price control when there is an overabundance.

https://www.nrdc.org/experts/dana-g...uch-fresh-produce-we-grow-never-makes-it-farm

The U.S. farm system is among the most productive and automated in the world. In fact is envied by other countries who strive to imitate it.

Secondly -- the non-contract iPhones at $600 or more are selling very well in the U.S. Just go read the announcements from T-Mobile and others who are hitting sales records on non-contract iPhones. Your assertion that no iPhone models will sell at $840 is already debunked -- many of the higher end models with upgraded memory, etc. are already selling near this price.

In actuality the end of subsidized phones in the cell industry will lead to increased iPhone sales at higher prices -- very positive for Apple in the long run.

Why Verizon killing subsidized phones is good for Apple
http://www.cultofmac.com/384691/why-verizon-killing-subsidized-phones-is-good-for-apple/
 
And it's not just automation. American farmers are leading the way in new environmentally friendly farming practices both in livestock and crops. The new practices are really just the old practices our fore fathers used. Good for the land, avoids bad publicity, and of course more economical in the long run. Smaller farmers (1200 acres or less in America) often have day jobs or another source of income and the family farm is preserved for the beautiful lifestyle it provides for the kids and family. The larger farms were all incorporated years ago and it is still a big gambling business. Almost nothing grown in the midwest bread basket is for human consumption unless you call cattle feed and corn syrup food. Ethanol anybody? No thanks, I don't even like to feed that to my car. Cotton subsidies are the most interesting because it is quite clear Texas cotton can't survive on the world market if not subsidized. Meanwhile the poor cotton farmer in Africa is left with nothing year after year getting his seeds and manure on credit and owing it all to the bank at harvest. What to do?
 
Back
Top