You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Trump being Alinskyied by right and left ?
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
Of course it is possible, unless you mean politically. Then I would have to grant you that politically Sanders would run into the special interests represented by our congressmen and senators. Nevertheless, go to his website, if you would, and look at the section entitled "How Sanders would Pay for His Plan ". It's Very doable from a budget standpoint.Again, Sanders makes "Hope and Change" look credible. You would have to be a complete knob to believe 10% of what this guy says is possible.
Let me, for example, just mention a single component of the Medical Cartel that is crucial to their maintaining control: The Food and Drug Administration. A President Sanders could completely break the strangle hold the pharmaceutical industry has on prescription drug pricing and dispensing with a single stroke of the pen in combination with his choice as FDA commissioner. Similarly, a President Sanders as Commander and Chief of the Armed Forces would have veto power over military operations and procurement. So although Congress controls the purse strings, the President controls to a large extent how money in the purse gets spent. The President, through his Executive Department Heads can effect regulatory decisions. So do not think for a moment that a strong, cantankerous President Sanders wouldn't be every bit Congress's match. His Twenty five years of working with Republicans and Democrats in Congress would be a tremendous asset.
my main voting points from now to the foreseeable future are anti establishment... and pro sealed borders until jobs and strong growth return.
unfortunately every candidate is less than 100% trustworthy when it comes to those issues. Sanders is not even in the running on protecting american's and union peoples earnings from being diluted by illegal and massive migration.
Sanders and Clinton's positions on immigration make them anti job and anti union wages from any American perspective. They will either back off these stances in the election or lose the support of union members in massive chunks.
unfortunately every candidate is less than 100% trustworthy when it comes to those issues. Sanders is not even in the running on protecting american's and union peoples earnings from being diluted by illegal and massive migration.
Sanders and Clinton's positions on immigration make them anti job and anti union wages from any American perspective. They will either back off these stances in the election or lose the support of union members in massive chunks.
Of course it is possible, unless you mean politically. Then I would have to grant you that politically Sanders would run into the special interests represented by our congressmen and senators. Nevertheless, go to his website, if you would, and look at the section entitled "How Sanders would Pay for His Plan ". It's Very doable from a budget standpoint.
Let me, for example, just mention a single component of the Medical Cartel that is crucial to their maintaining control: The Food and Drug Administration. A President Sanders could completely break the strangle hold the pharmaceutical industry has on prescription drug pricing and dispensing with a single stroke of the pen in combination with his choice as FDA commissioner. Similarly, a President Sanders as Commander and Chief of the Armed Forces would have veto power over military operations and procurement. So although Congress controls the purse strings, the President controls to a large extent how money in the purse gets spent. The President, through his Executive Department Heads can effect regulatory decisions. So do not think for a moment that a strong, cantankerous President Sanders wouldn't be every bit Congress's match. His Twenty five years of working with Republicans and Democrats in Congress would be a tremendous asset.
Last edited:
Maybe so, but why make Wall Street Speculators pay for it? What did we ever do? Why not make iphone users pay for it? They are the ones living on slave labor.