Trump bars CNN and NYT from press briefing.

So obviously you failed to watch the Tucker Carlson vs Washington Post Erik Wemple: Media Bias & Fake News video - which is what we were discussing.
Give me a link to some real evidence, and not a Carlson episode. I've watched Carlson in the past. He's about as much of a journalist as Hannity. (= 0)
 
Give me a link to some real evidence, and not a Carlson episode. I've watched Carlson in the past. He's about as much of a journalist as Hannity. (= 0)
koolaid.gif
 
And yet you have nothing to say about the Russian government planting paid articles in the Washington Post every week made to look like normal articles in the paper.
Well in this case... you simply need to order the Washington Post. You can read the articles each week.
Really? Are you pulling this straight out of your ass or is there a more circuitous route?
 
I guess this is why most Post readers think Russia taking over Crimea is such a great gift to the Ukraine.

Honestly, I think their coverage of Russia and Putin is over the top hostile, but of course that could have been driven by the need to justify Obama's fixation on Putin. Now they are part of this clumsy deep state plot to revive the Cold War and try to ludicrously paint Trump as some sort of dupe or worse.

In short, the WashPost is unethical, dishonest and a danger to our country.
 
If you don't believe the Washington Post reporter agreeing with Carlson's assertions in the video then you should go directly to the source and buy the paper yourself?
I watched the first 5 minutes because I can't watch Carlson longer than that. He is an utter asshole. He asks a question, and then doesn't let the guy answer, but rather pivots to something tangential. Again and again, talking over him, all the while laughing. This is journalism? You betcha!

The guy said it was native advertising. So what are you talking about?
And yet you have nothing to say about the Russian government planting paid articles in the Washington Post every week made to look like normal articles in the paper.
It's a type of advertorial. You can't tell the difference? Really? I'm not a fan of them, but you guys really do have a edge on hypocrisy.

Native advertising. Did someone say Breitbart?

https://www.ft.com/content/d8b44718-7362-11e6-b60a-de4532d5ea35

I see you have no problem there...
 
Back
Top