No problem. Piece of advice. If you see Hillary stumbling around the building where you guys work, duck into an empty office. She really hates to have to interact with the hired help.
Trump backers realize they’ve been played by Assange
- Thread starter Tony Stark
- Start date
No problem. Piece of advice. If you see Hillary stumbling around the building where you guys work, duck into an empty office. She really hates to have to interact with the hired help.
The Atlantic magazine has made only two presidential endorsements in its 159-year history: one for Abraham Lincoln in 1860 and one for Lyndon B. Johnson in 1964.
The third comes Wednesday afternoon, when the magazine posted an editorial endorsing Hillary Clinton for president and dismissing Donald J. Trump as “the most ostentatiously unqualified major-party candidate in the 227-year history of the American presidency.” For good measure, it calls him “a demagogue, a xenophobe, a sexist, a know-nothing and a liar.”
One day earlier, the Vanity Fair editor Graydon Carter wrote, in his editor’s letter for the November issue, “Through word or action, Trump has promoted gun violence, bigotry, ignorance, intolerance, lying, and just about everything else that can be wrong with society.”
That came after USA Today made the first presidential endorsement in its history — or, more accurately, a “disendorsement,” as it came out against Mr. Trump (“unfit for the presidency”) but not for Hillary Clinton or some other alternative.
This is the time in the election cycle when media columnists write about whether endorsements have much to do with the outcome. The answer is usually, if not always, “no.”
But the question takes on another dimension this year because of the sheer weight of the endorsements against Mr. Trump. They are overwhelmingly against him, and they just keep coming, in language that is notable for its blunt condemnation of the candidate and its “save the Republic’’ tone.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/06/b...orialists-have-spoken-will-voters-listen.html
The third comes Wednesday afternoon, when the magazine posted an editorial endorsing Hillary Clinton for president and dismissing Donald J. Trump as “the most ostentatiously unqualified major-party candidate in the 227-year history of the American presidency.” For good measure, it calls him “a demagogue, a xenophobe, a sexist, a know-nothing and a liar.”
One day earlier, the Vanity Fair editor Graydon Carter wrote, in his editor’s letter for the November issue, “Through word or action, Trump has promoted gun violence, bigotry, ignorance, intolerance, lying, and just about everything else that can be wrong with society.”
That came after USA Today made the first presidential endorsement in its history — or, more accurately, a “disendorsement,” as it came out against Mr. Trump (“unfit for the presidency”) but not for Hillary Clinton or some other alternative.
This is the time in the election cycle when media columnists write about whether endorsements have much to do with the outcome. The answer is usually, if not always, “no.”
But the question takes on another dimension this year because of the sheer weight of the endorsements against Mr. Trump. They are overwhelmingly against him, and they just keep coming, in language that is notable for its blunt condemnation of the candidate and its “save the Republic’’ tone.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/06/b...orialists-have-spoken-will-voters-listen.html
No one likes Trump because he's amazing.
He represents a change in politics.
Different than all the shit they shuffle up there every 4 years.
That's what has captivated the voter base.
What's hilarious is that all of these endorsements are NEVER because the endorser believes Hilary to be a good leader. It's just a vote against Trump.
People who vote this way should never be allowed to participate in an election.
He represents a change in politics.
Different than all the shit they shuffle up there every 4 years.
That's what has captivated the voter base.
What's hilarious is that all of these endorsements are NEVER because the endorser believes Hilary to be a good leader. It's just a vote against Trump.
People who vote this way should never be allowed to participate in an election.
Clinton campaign just beat Assangel at his own game.
