Trump Argues Pre-Existing Conditions Protections are Unconstitutional

[Good1]

Btw, in exchange for de-nuclearizing, Kim Un is demanding access to US voter-rich social media to start threads about US political issues without having to register as a foreign agent.

What a dictator!

If Trump is a dictator too, he'll probly allow it, even though it's against Moooler's law.

 

[exGOPer]

Btw, in exchange for de-nuclearizing

Just like universal healthcare that Trump passed, that too would happen. Always trust a fat narcissist born into wealth and power, it's the golden rule.

 

[Good1]

Just like universal healthcare that Trump passed, that too would happen. Always trust a fat narcissist born into wealth and power, it's the golden rule.

I'm not British and even I wouldn't talk about Churchill that way.

Problem with allowing KimUn unfettered access to US voter-rich social media to start inflammatory threads everyday, is then every other dictator will demand equal access, like Trudeau. And May would probably complain about the special relationship that allows North Koreans into the US political influence industry, but denies the same privaledges to pernicious British subjects, according to Moooler's law.

Then the US would have to open its doors to all sorts of foreign political influence.

 

[exGOPer]

I'm not British and even I wouldn't talk about Churchill that way.

Problem with allowing KimUn unfettered access to US voter-rich social media to start inflammatory threads everyday, is then every other dictator will demand equal access, like Trudeau. And May would probably complain about the special relationship that allows North Koreans into the US political influence industry, but denies the same privaledges to pernicious British subjects, according to Moooler's law.

Then the US would have to open its doors to all sorts of foreign political influence.

Yes, Republicans hate that

 

[gwb-trading]

Every year since Obamacare was enacted my company sends out a notice that our healthcare payments are going up significantly and our coverage is being reduced. In each of these notices the company states this is directly attributable to ACA.

 

[Cuddles]

Every year since Obamacare was enacted my company sends out a notice that our healthcare payments are going up significantly and our coverage is being reduced. In each of these notices the company states this is directly attributable to ACA.

Your company wants you to vote republican so they can get juicy tax cuts and they use ACA as a wedge issue.

 

[jem]

Obamacare is a large issue for millions Americans. Its funny that vast majority of pro Obamacare posters here are foreign trolls who don't live in America.

It is the most unAmerican thing that has happened in my lifetime. Forcing people to pay money to a third companies as the govt colludes with those companies to overcharge people.

Your company wants you to vote republican so they can get juicy tax cuts and they use ACA as a wedge issue.

 

[UsualName]

look - you sobs ran my 10,000 deductible up to 1300 month. (It was under 500 if I recall. maybe it should have gone up a few hundred over the last few years.)

That is 15,600 dollars plus up another 10,000 or so before our insurance kicks in.
25,000 a year so others can get a discount... at least half that is stolen beyond market rates.

the govt should be paying for helping others directly... not be rigging the prices we pay for insurance through garbage exchanges.

Stop with the stealing from the income tax payers.

Get your democart assholes to work with republican assholes and fix this theft.

There is a whole portion of America who will never vote for a democrat again...until you do.

And you foreign trolls have no business talking about this... you need to register before discussing U.S. politics in front of an election.

So I owned a health insurance business for many years. We marketed group, individual and Medicare. Many carriers in multiple states.

How many people were on your plan when you had a $500 premium and what were the exclusions and caps?

You may have had a skinny plan, which is fine if that’s what you want but don’t think that is comprehensive. If you got the old plans summary of benefits I would love to take a look at what you were getting.

 

[jem]

We got the plan through my profession and we are part of a large pool.
we did not and do not have a skinny plan

our health care providers did not change
as far as we are impacted nothing about our plan or providers changed in any way we can discern... other than the fact the plan went up over 150 percent.

So I owned a health insurance business for many years. We marketed group, individual and Medicare. Many carriers in multiple states.

How many people were on your plan when you had a $500 premium and what were the exclusions and caps?

You may have had a skinny plan, which is fine if that’s what you want but don’t think that is comprehensive. If you got the old plans summary of benefits I would love to take a look at what you were getting.

 

[UsualName]

We got the plan through my profession and we are part of a large pool.
we did not and do not have a skinny plan

our health care providers did not change
as far as we are impacted nothing about our plan or providers changed in any way we can discern... other than the fact the plan went up over 150 percent.

If it’s a large group and comprehensive coverage then your pool most likely experienced large claims.

Obamacare had a positive impact on group coverage due to the 80/20 rule. That actually stabilized premiums. It was Indy plans that got hurt from subscribers jumping ship into the exchanges. People with skinny plans experienced sticker shock with the new mandatory benefits but they didn’t really have health insurance to begin with.