Trump Approval Rating Above 50% in Just 17 States, Worth Only 102 Electoral College Votes

[TJustice]

I will use myself as an example.
If I got polled today...
I would not say I would vote for Trump
I would not say I approve of the job he is doing.
But, I can't vote for a marxist so I am likely a Trump vote if he wins in the primary even though I would prefer a candidate that would pull concessions towards lower taxes and freedom out of the establishment democrats and republicans.

There are probably 10 million voters just like me.

 

[gwb-trading]

Democrats won 22 Senate races,republicans won 11

Democrats got 53 million Senate votes,republicans got 35 million.

Democrats won the Senate races in Pennsylvania,Wisconsin,Michigan,Nevada,Virginia ,Minnesota ,Arizona and Ohio in 2018,the states that will decide 2020.

Dems won all of the blue senate seat races.

Democrats won 8 of the 9 swing state senate seats and only lost the 9th by 20,000 votes


Democrats won red states West Virginia,Montana and Arizona and came within 2.5 points in Texas,a seat that republicans won by 25 and 16 points in the prior 2 elections.

Republicans lost all blue state races,8 out of 9 swing state races and 3 red state races and only won thier biggest EC state by 2.5 points

Thanks for submitting more evidence that you are a complete and utter failure at basic math.

On an historical basis for the minority party in the mid-term elections the Democratic performance in the 2018 House elections is average; the Democratic performance in the 2018 Senate elections is greatly below average.

Trying to pump up the Democratic results as a fortuitous preview of the 2020 election for Democrats is a very poor partisan interpretation of the results. The opposite is actually true - the 2018 results show the Democratic party has a long hard path ahead for the 2020 election.

 

[Tony Stark]

On an historical basis for the minority party in the mid-term elections the Democratic performance in the 2018 House elections is average;

Yeah, winning by the most votes ever is average.

 

[Tony Stark]

; the Democratic performance in the 2018 Senate elections is greatly below average.

.

Yeah,winning twice as many races and getting 18 million more votes is below avarage

 

[Tony Stark]

the 2018 results show the Democratic party has a long hard path ahead for the 2020 election.

I need to borrow that meth pipe meme you are always posting.

 

[gwb-trading]

I need to borrow that meth pipe meme you are always posting.

The first part of Democrats having any future success in 2020 is admitting to yourselves that 2018 was basically a failure for the party. While gains were made in the U.S. House the performance was merely historically average. The Republican party gained seats in the Senate. Across the nation in state & local races Democrats under-performed in the 2018 election. Pumping the total numbers of people who voted Democratic based on the large numbers of voters in large Democratic states like California is meaningless on a national basis.

 

[Tony Stark]

The first part of Democrats having any future success in 2020 is admitting to yourselves that 2018 was basically a failure for the party. While gains were made in the U.S. House the performance was merely historically average. The Republican party gained seats in the Senate. Across the nation in state & local races Democrats under-performed in the 2018 election. Pumping the total numbers of people who voted Democratic based on the large numbers of voters in large Democratic states like California is meaningless on a national basis.

I thought you understood gerrymandering and alternating favorable Senate maps but I must be wrong.I suggest you look into those 2 subjects.

 

[Tony Stark]

The first part of Democrats having any future success in 2020 is admitting to yourselves that 2018 was basically a failure for the party. While gains were made in the U.S. House the performance was merely historically average. The Republican party gained seats in the Senate. Across the nation in state & local races Democrats under-performed in the 2018 election. Pumping the total numbers of people who voted Democratic based on the large numbers of voters in large Democratic states like California is meaningless on a national basis.

Obama 2008 votes-69 million
Republicans 2010 house votes-44 million

Trump 2016 votes-63 million
Democrats 2018 house votes-61 million

 

[gwb-trading]

I thought you understood gerrymandering and alternating favorable Senate maps but I must be wrong.I suggest you look into those 2 subjects.

So how can you gerrymander Senate maps? Senators are elected on a state-wide basis.

This is a good time to note that there are many Democratic states such as Maryland, Connecticut, New Hampshire, Nevada, Oregon, California, Illinois, Massachusetts and others that are gerrymandered -- yet you conveniently ignore this reality.

Democrats Hate Gerrymandering—Except When They Get to Do It
In Maryland, New Mexico, and elsewhere, Democrats are just as guilty as the Republicans are in other states—which tells us that the real problem is deeper.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/democrats-hate-gerrymanderingexcept-when-they-get-to-do-it

 

[Tony Stark]

So how can you gerrymander Senate maps? Senators are elected on a state-wide basis.

Obviously I was referring to the house portion of your post.As far as the senate, democrats won twice as many races and got 18 million more votes.