Trump Aides: Russia Flap Proves Don Jr. Is the ‘Fredo’ of the First Family

So the Trump admin is pushing the narrative on the nothing burger while they are not investigating the big crimes because they are too busy. LOL

Hey I don't speak for the Trump admin like you speak for the opposition admin. Nothingburger is an apt term that I have taken on board to describe what you and your kind are doing.

"Too busy", the way I've used it means politically intimidated, and so, instead of going after serious crime, making "make work", (looking busy in support of unconstitutional prohibitions, goody two shoe busy body) against probably 20% of Trump's base. and 30% of every other base. That's what Sessions is doing. It's called INTIMIDATION, and we see Sessions AND POTUS, responding to intimidation in their own ways...showing they are intimidated...which is the whole point of the nothingburger.
 
Basically, if Sessions would just catalogue all the laws that your side says Trump has broken, and go after Hillary's circle with the same unmerciful standard, he would fulfill Trump's campaign promises, and bring the ring down with their own standards. Should someone go to jail for dealing with Russians...or, should someone go to jail for influencing foreign affairs and overturning elections around the world? Then yes, bust Hillary, her paymasters, and her paytakers, on those charges, and throw away the key.
 
So the argument is that Jr. should have declined the offer to meet, AND turn over all evidence the arranged meeting to law enforcement. Can't have Russian operatives meddling around in our election process, might be damaging to our political system. Sounds peachy. Got a little question for ya'. Lets say someone inside one of our own intel agencies decides to leak info to the media. Perhaps a D.C. insider has the goods. Does the very pious, holier than thou journalist have an obligation to turn that over to law enforcement before running the story? No? Why not? (I'll admit turning over leaked info to the very people doing the leaking is problematic). Is this leaking of classified info not a threat to our political system? Now let me ask ya'll another question. Which of these two scenarios is a greater threat? Are we the people not completely and totally dependent on a unbiased media to get to the facts and truth? Is this not why this organization has been given so much power in the 1st amendment? It can be easily argued that their number one job is to hold the governments feet to the fire? It can be expected that in the dirty business of politics the truth will be elusive, facts will be twisted and distorted to fit an agenda. This is a given. This is also exactly why we need a honest and trustworthy press to tell us the facts and give us the unvarnished truth. Instead they run around like children in a candy store gorging themselves on every little tidbit they can get their grubby little hands on. Worse, they then magnify, or minimize as necessary, mis-inform with half truths and quotes taken out of context, edit, slice and dice video to suit their take and then hide their "unnamed sources" as protected by the constitution. It's clear that a media like this, the one we have, is much more of a threat than a to be expected lying politician.
 
There once was a shepherd boy who was bored as he sat on the hillside watching the village sheep. To amuse himself he took a great breath and sang out, "Wolf! Wolf! The Wolf is chasing the sheep!"

The unflagging tedium of the Trump-Russia-Manafort-Guccifer 2.0-Kushner-Page-Comey-Flynn-Steele-Stone-Lavrov-Mueller-WikiLeaks-Fancy Bear-Intercept-CIA-FBI-NSA-BBC-Don Jr. saga refuses to go away. Every day there are new breathless reports, fresh for-initiates-only micro-revelations that inspire screeches of "Treason!"

But there is still no smoking gun.

Now hold on, you may be rage-typing. What about his emails? You know, those emails in which Donald Trump Jr. was promised "official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful" to his father; those emails about "very high-level and sensitive information" that "is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump"; those emails in which Trump Jr. gleefully replied, "If it's what you say I love it."

To which I say: This is still not a smoking gun.

This is hardly the first This is it moment the media has begged us to acknowledge. Please remember that a year ago we were expected to believe that Donald Trump had committed treason by begging the Russian government to hack Hillary Clinton's emails live on cable television, before an audience of millions. We all know that this is exactly how espionage works and that there is no way that the smiling ex-reality television show host was making a joke about the actual documented collusion between the former secretary of state's campaign and the Democratic National Committee, which marshaled their forces against an honest public servant who could arguably have beaten Trump in a general election if the primary had not been rigged.

And so it has continued, uninterrupted without so much as a hint of self-reproach or critical reflection, and so it will continue, presumably, "from day to day / To the last syllable of recorded time," in saecula saeculorum. One week James Comey is a selfless hero for not giving in to febrile right-wing pressure groups and conspiracy theorists by recommending charges over Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server to conduct official State Department business; a few months later he is a conservabro villain doing his team a solid by speaking publicly about the FBI's ongoing investigation of Clinton's email use; fast forward to a few weeks ago, and he is a dauntless profile in courage because he wrote down things that the president said to him. It's one thing after another, and no one seems to be tired of it.

Today we are supposed to mouth along because Don Jr., who is not as dumb as he looks (which is not, I realize, setting the bar very high), tweeted screenshots of his Nigerian-prince-like email exchanges with a poseur who pretended in the loosest possible sense to represent the interests of the Russian government. The emails led to a meeting that went nowhere. Knock me over with a feather.


These gaspingly reported revelations about the Trumps will make you furious if you want them to. They may make you squirm if you have suddenly decided that the unfettered operation of our intelligence services is extremely important now even if it used to be boring when Jeb Bush released 40-page white papers on the subject and you tweeted about turtles instead. They may confirm your belief that the Trumps are traitors. But none of this new information offers any actual direct evidence that President Trump knowingly or otherwise colluded or in any sense partnered with Vladimir Putin or the Russian government to secure his election as president of the United States.

And really: Is anything that we actually know today about Trump and Russia worse than what we knew last year about Hillary Clinton?

Here was a presidential candidate whose husband, a former president, runs an international pseudo-charity that keeps him on a never-ending series of private jet flights to an equally interminable number of luxury hotels in exotic locales — a gruesome neoliberal shakedown machine with metal tentacles sunk into the bank accounts of shady businessmen and tinpot dictators the whole world round. An infinite number of grasping conflict-of-interest stories could have been written about the Clinton Foundation, and many were. But they didn't matter nearly as much as TRUMP AND RUSSIA.

Which brings us to what all this is really about: the 2016 election, which will not end until its successor in 2020 formally begins, something I expect by the end of the year, if it hasn't already happened yet. Russia did not swing the election to Trump. He won because Americans, including hundreds of thousands who had voted for President Obama eight years previously, thought he was a more compelling candidate than Clinton. Trump did a better job speaking the language of solidarity to the working class. Get over it, and pick a better candidate next time.
http://theweek.com/articles/711171/isnt-watergate-isnt-treason-theres-still-no-smoking-gun
 
DEoNOrAU0AIB8n2.jpg
 
Back
Top