You are confusing evidence with proof.Her plan is to impeach Biden despite not having a shred of evidence
Lots of evidence but no proof yet
Dont forget in court you dont need proof to convict only evidence beyond a reasonable doubt
You are confusing evidence with proof.Her plan is to impeach Biden despite not having a shred of evidence
You are confusing evidence with proof.
Lots of evidence but no proof yet
Dont forget in court you dont need proof to convict only evidence beyond a reasonable doubt
Read yourselfThere is no evidence and there is no proof. Stop playing stupid semantics games.
Yep---there are a lot of RINOs in Congreff. Buck is not credible.House Republican Tells Fox News There’s ‘Little to No Evidence’ Supporting Key Theory Behind Biden Impeachment
https://www.mediaite.com/news/house...pporting-key-theory-behind-biden-impeachment/
Yep---there are a lot of RINOs in Congreff. Buck is not credible.
Yep---there are a lot of RINOs in Congreff. Buck is not credible.
It will be easier to point out the correct item. Here it is--Can you point to anything incorrect in his statements?