Trump admin contemplating limited strikes on North Korea: "might help in the midterm elections"

Read your fucking post you stupid tit sucking lying fascist. MORON!

WTF did I lie about, my post is a quote from Washington Examiner -a right wing rag, if you got a problem with them then go troll them on their twitter, I have no interest in your irrelevant blabber.
 
You goddamn lying sack of shit exgroper
Look what you cut and paste!
And then look at your link.

You can’t even cut and paste without lying.

And who was this quote attributed to? Some Korean at the WSJ bureau in Seoul?
Who deleted his tweet short after Sarah strong slapped it down?

Not only are you liar but you are stupid as well.

https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2018...tical-bloody-nose-strike-against-north-korea/

Where is the fucking lie, your inbred eyes need sorting out.

I quoted DIRECTLY from Washington Examiner and I provided the SOURCE of the article where they worded it from.

And I don't give a fuck what someone at WSJ did, that's not my fucking problem. Did Washington Examiner take down their article? Then why is this any of my problem. Go feud with them.

When your leader is a pedophile who lies 100 times a day, try not to use lying as an insult, lying and scamming is what your entire cult is built on. Dumb fucking Cons getting tipsy about words when their messiah lies 5 times in a single breath.

Go back to Trump University Con, don't lecture others on lies when you ballwash a degenerate child rapist like Trump.
 
Trump lies - so I can lie!!!
Says all the Elitist Dems who gossip like high schoolers in a cafeteria.

You changed the quote.

Yer a fucking liar.
 
Trump lies - so I can lie!!!
Says all the Elitist Dems who gossip like high schoolers in a cafeteria.

You changed the quote.

Yer a fucking liar.

Again, where is the fucking lie.

Did Washington Examiner redact their article?

Did Washington Examiner remove the words 'reported' from their article?

Did ownership of Washington Examiner change from a right wing conservative rag to a liberal one?

Given the answer is NO to all of those questions and you won't get specific with either of them, prove this mythical lie you keep blabbering about.

I didn't change any fucking quote, go read the fucking WE article and get back here and apologize for your deranged rants.

You think I would actually read entire articles so that I can write my own synopsis for you Cons to read? You are as delusional as a Trump University first year undergraduate.
 
Again, where is the fucking lie.

Did Washington Examiner redact their article?

Did Washington Examiner remove the words 'reported' from their article?

Did ownership of Washington Examiner change from a right wing conservative rag to a liberal one?

Given the answer is NO to all of those questions and you won't get specific with either of them, prove this mythical lie you keep blabbering about.

I didn't change any fucking quote, go read the fucking WE article and get back here and apologize for your deranged rants.

You think I would actually read entire articles so that I can write my own synopsis for you Cons to read? You are as delusional as a Trump University first year undergraduate.
Read what you cut and paste In the first post.
Then go to the link that you posted.
Are you fucking dense?
You CHANGED what you cut and pasted.

You are a fucking liar.
And now you’ve been caught in your lie, like the WSJ Seoul Bureau Chief, But unlike him, you won’t take it back.

Go back to your sanctuary city and rub your pussy, snowflake.
 
Again, where is the fucking lie.

Did Washington Examiner redact their article?

Did Washington Examiner remove the words 'reported' from their article?

Did ownership of Washington Examiner change from a right wing conservative rag to a liberal one?

Given the answer is NO to all of those questions and you won't get specific with either of them, prove this mythical lie you keep blabbering about.

I didn't change any fucking quote, go read the fucking WE article and get back here and apologize for your deranged rants.

You think I would actually read entire articles so that I can write my own synopsis for you Cons to read? You are as delusional as a Trump University first year undergraduate.

Bro, you're just getting trolled
 
read the post that was cut and pasted from the original Korean link and changed reported from reportedly.
Fucking dishonest leftists retards on this site. Go Lie on Huffpo In the comment sections you Baristas!


If you found that untruthful or deceptive than you must really hate Trump:rolleyes:
 
If you hate Trump cuz he lies then you must hate Hilary Clinton!!!!
See how stupid this game can get?


Trump lies far more than Hillary ever has




Fact Checker
Analysis

President Trump has made 1,628 false or misleading claims over 298 days


By Glenn Kessler, Meg Kelly and Nicole Lewis November 14, 2017

For some reason, our year-long project analyzing, categorizing and tracking every false or misleading claim by President Trump had seemed like quite a burden in the past month. Well, the numbers are in and now we know why: In the past 35 days, Trump has averaged an astonishing nine claims a day.

The total now stands at 1,628 claims in 298 days, or an average of 5.5 claims a day. That puts the president on track to reach 1,999 claims by the end of his first year in office, though he obviously would easily exceed 2,000 if he maintained the pace of the past month. (Our full interactive graphic can be found here.)

As regular readers know, the president has a tendency to repeat himself — often. There are now at least 50 claims that he has repeated three or more times.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-claims-over-298-days/?utm_term=.8f33c37799a6






image.png
 
Back
Top