Quote from Equalizer:
Hi Guys, you're very welcome.
Circle, I'm not sure that Scholes was referring to the Black-Scholes model in particular, rather the models that LTCM were using. Frightening leverage though.
Regardless, what is surprising from the film is Scholes - for the brilliant man that he is - just didn't get it.
I kinda like Merton though, the man is not afraid to show some emotion, and he really is one of the nicest guys you could meet.
Hey rufus, you must have some interesting stories from the exchanges you spent some time in.
Cheers, EQ.
Actually I am mostly an off-floor electronic trader (running mostly automated strategies for the past 4-5 years), so I have never spent significant time on the floor. But my observations on the floor did show me a different perspective, a very useful one.
I used to argue that the core LTCM convergence strategy never did that badly (lost about $500-600M in total), it is the directional trades (such as the absolutely disastrous direction trade on S&P500 vol, that lost $1.3B) that killed the fund. So I think there isn't a black / white whether their "models" worked, they have a large variety of models, it is the correlation between the models that took the fund down to its knees, and then the directional trades are the nail on the coffin.
To use my own experience as a small example. I was a part of a smallish hedge fund in '98-'01, the fund did very well in '99 (up >200%), so investor money flood in (we grew from about 90-100M to over 220 in less than 2 months). So we sat on top of a pile of money that honestly we didn't know what to do with, our core strategy, risk-arb and value rotation, faced some scale problems (heck, how many stocks can you call "value" in 2000 anyways). So we started experimenting with different strategies, such as stat arb, etc. While none of the experiments did particularly badly, it took the fund's attention away from the core strategies, and the combination, along with the equity market bubble bursting in Apr/May/Jun in 2000, took the fund down 35-40%. So instead of hoping to hit the high watermark again, we folded the fund, returned the investor money. The partners wasn't going to sit around and make 800k, when they took home 8-10M the year before.
So stick with the core competencies is key, and only expand rationally. I think LTCM suffered from the same type of over-extention, and over-confidence in their models in markets they are not familiar with.