Quote from Lucrum:
Because the neighborhood had experienced a rash of burglaries and the shooter didn't recognize the boy as a resident of that neighborhood.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from trendlover:
I know the burglaries happened before. So you think Zimmerman know every person in the whole neighborhood? Then he see the boy and think he does not live there because Zimmerman know every person in the whole neighborhood what they look like and he not recognize that boy, so he is suspicious?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Quote from Lucrum:
Again, you seem to be obsessed with largely irrelevant points.
I certainly don't know/recognize everyone in my neighborhood. But had I been doing a neighborhood watch I may very well have followed this kid the same as the shooter did. I have no particular problem with that. Now, if we were to learn later that the shooter initiated any confrontation, then I'd be a lot less harsh on the dead kid. Until then, the facts as they are know now, the kid assaulted the shooter. And got shot in the process. I'm OK with that.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Quote from MarketMasher:
I consider this one of the most level-headed comments posted.
That is you make the point of Zimmerman did not recognize the boy, not me.
There is only one witness to what happened to start the fight - Zimmerman. The police have no reason to question his version of events since most of what he says was corroborated by witnesses and the 911 call recording. There seems there is no physical evidence to suggest otherwise.Quote from gwb-trading:
I would like to hear your proof that Zimmerman did not attack Martin? I expect you have none.
You appear to have an issue with logical thinking in this case.
Quote from Lucrum:
I'd like to hear your proof that he did.
Quote from Lucrum:
Because the neighborhood had experienced a rash of burglaries and the shooter didn't recognize the boy as a resident of that neighborhood.
Well that settles then , it all boils down to how some lawmaker making a decision from incomplete information as to how it "appeared " to him.Quote from gwb-trading:
So you are admitting you have no proof that Martin attacked Zimmerman first. It appears we are at an impasse.
Except for the part that the authors of Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law stating that Zimmerman has no protection under their law and needs to be arrested.
Trayvon Martin case: Sponsors of Florida âStand Your Groundâ law say George Zimmerman should be arrested
âThey got the goods on him. They need to prosecute whoever shot the kid,â former GOP state lawmaker says
The Florida lawmakers who crafted the state's controversial "Stand Your Ground" law said neighborhood watch volunteer George Zimmerman should be arrested for shooting and killing unarmed teen Trayvon Martin.
Former state Sen. Durell Peaden and current state Rep. Dennis Baxley said the law they wrote in 2005, which allows someone who feels threatened to "meet force with force" without backing down first, was being misapplied in the shooting death of the 17-year-old, the Miami Herald reported.
"They got the goods on him. They need to prosecute whoever shot the kid," Peaden, a Republican, told the Herald. "He has no protection under my law."
...
But Peaden and Baxley said that 911 tapes showing that Zimmerman followed Martin despite a dispatcher's request to stay away appeared to show that the 28-year-old crime watch volunteer was the aggressor.
"The guy lost his defense right then," Peaden told the Herald. "When he said, 'I'm following him,' he lost his defense."
No argument here from me. But these are guidelines, not necessarily laws.Quote from gwb-trading:
... As outlined in the training, Do NOT get out of your vehicle. Do NOT confront the suspicous individual. You do not have any law enforcement powers as a neighborhood watch person....