Joe, you make some rather inappropriate remarks.
There are probably many people who are scientists here in ET. One of their reference bases is the US repository for such work. For your convenience check it out. When you get to six consecutive citations where the reference code is assigned, consider how many more citations you must go through to arrive at a point where someone else is handed out six consecutive numbers.
When a person is running two of five divisions of the largest coalition (consortiumj) of academic organizations in the world, being a PI concurrently on several projects in several distinct fields is a possibility.
My record is clear and it is exceptional.
A person quoted a statement that is in the form of a null hypothesis test. In binary vector deductive analysis (scientific), it is not possible to make a statement that is more succinct.
Being succinct in analysis is not a handicap. It requires statements to be made at the highest level of the hierarchy of principles that could be involved.
Here is my statement:
"Making money ends most often by making money not continuing"
It says what the null test is for completing the extraction of a full segment of profits.
Completion of taking the offer of the market is best measured in five segments across a window.
A continual test of making money is performed on all fronts. I use 10 to 12 specific logic sets.
These sets feed into what may be construed as an optimization circuit or logic set. Everything that is supposed to happen happens in the correct order of events.
Since most traders who use optimization have to consider a multiple of the market's capacity, this optimization is moslty related to optimizing partial fills without affecting the market.
Under optimum conditions, the making of money comes to an end during a hold of a postion. Having an ultra expert approach to making realized profits optimum is what it is all about.
For example, look at a Wall on the DOM. Plot its values over time. No trades took place; those people just did stuff that didn't affect optimizing making money.
Joe, you are an example of a person who slams other people. You slam the same people over and over. You do it because you are fulfilling your needs. No one expects your needs to change.
Your comments about me are just part of the interplay of different kinds of people on ET. They have nothing to do with my walk or my talk.
Trends end. The end is designated FTT or ftt in a set of nested fractals whose contruction is structurally determinant. Volume leads price. It is the equivalent of "shooting fish in a barrel". I could care less that you do not "get it".
Keep slamming me. Fulfill your continuing needs.