Trendfollowers: When oh when are we going to start making some $$$?

Quote from chefboyamihngry:

show sone respect ! I was nominated for the nobel prize in sous chefism.

Chef boy am I hungry

Show respect for someone that crashes a site he has already been banned from . . . yea right. You deserve nothing . . . exactly what you are worth.
 
Quote from chefboyamihngry:

thanks! This guy has Gotta be stomped out or another noob will go down the wrong path. Looks like he whitewashed the web of his perfect trading claims. I saw the clown at surf fest couple years ago. He is quite chef like in person.

:)


So you or your butt brother Equaltoothless trade me online for a week. That would be an easy way to show that I'm a bullshitter, right?

Oh that would embarrass you cause you nor Toothless can trade . . .

Oh, check your email.:p
 
Why is it that when I hear "FrothLogic" I think of the words "Pathological Liar, Charlatan, Clown, Fraud, Crook, BS artist..."? I wonder?
 
Another common-sense question: Why would someone who was successfully trading begrudge the modest amount of money required to be an ET sponsor? Why spend a lot of time and energy threading the needle around the terms-of-service -- avoiding linking to promotional site(s), etc? Why not come out of the closet -- hey, I'm a proud sponsor of ET, and here are the products I offer...?
 
Quote from Rodney King:

Another common-sense question: Why would someone who was successfully trading begrudge the modest amount of money required to be an ET sponsor? Why spend a lot of time and energy threading the needle around the terms-of-service -- avoiding linking to promotional site(s), etc? Why not come out of the closet -- hey, I'm a proud sponsor of ET, and here are the products I offer...?

And a common sense answer.
Vendors benefit from sponsorship. This is a great site and cost effective for them. I'm not selling anything here so why do I need to be a sponsor?
 
Quote from chefboyamihngry:

Good points Rodney. The obvious answer is the Chefs methods will be exposed as wishful thinking. He intentionlly keeps things vague since the methods would fail if tested objectively.

Common sense question:

If my method is vague and can't be tested objectively, why is David Goodboy aka Marketsurfer aka chefboyamihngry aka (20 other banned aliases) here repeatedly (for over 5 years) refused to test it or to trade with me heads up. I've given him every opportunity to test it and he's aways come up with one lame excuse or another.

Answer he's scared to death that if he tests it that he and all of the other asshole buddies that condemned it would have to eat their words. What better way to PROVE I'm a fake but trade me and watch my signals or test my method but that will never happen. Davy boy here and his group of miscreants don't have the balls between them to step up to the plate to make that happen.

I've sent my stuff for free to individuals that have asked and not a single one has ever come back and said that what I gave them DIDN'T help then trade better. That in itself pisses the shit out of the likes of Equaltoothless and Goodboy and his hedge fund huckering crowd.
 
Quote from chefboyamihngry:

I'm certain that if you were to post your system here or send it to surf or anyone they would put it thru the wringer. Go ahead prof. Post the code here! No?? What you afraid of? That it be proven fanciful?



Ps Chef. What I know of surf I have only heard. Him talk positively about you. It's your method he believes is bogus. You should really stop the personal attacks and either postthe code here or stfu!

You need to learn to differeniate personal attacks with the attacks on a claim. They font teach tat in chef school ?

It's quite funny to criticize a nobel prize nominee, especially one with a system I've found to be a top 10 S&P system easily at futurestruth.com, and that's just my version.

If you would like to think about why he wouldn't post the code here, you might find it a tad more logical to think about why he would. The answer is he wouldn't, which doesn't get anymore obvious nor does it require a philosophical debate about logic.
 
Quote from Equalizer:

Why is it that when I hear "FrothLogic" I think of the words "You want what you can't have. Ooh, damn, girl, that's too damn bad."? I wonder?

This is a typical reaction related to skepticism. It is actually quite offensive to insinuate such derogatory aspersions about the character of someone you'll never be priveleged enough to ever get to see his end product, even though he has posted charts of his software.
 
Quote from chefboyamihngry:

hi chef logic. Why don't you post a link to profs top 10 system on futures truth?


In time, and I can assure you, we are not the same person.
 
Quote from chefboyamihngry:

ok. I'll paitently wait for the system by the prof that I can't seem to locate.
Thanks

Should be out in several weeks, after it is incubated, but you or anyone else won't ever get to see the code, and futurestruth can't view it either. You can just see the results, but bear in mind my lame interpretation still beats everything out there and I've seen his actual system perform solidly well for many months.

I think the funniest part in the book he wrote is the warning: <b><i>This method is not for the novice investor.</b></i>

I guess it would only be funny to someone that knows how hard algorithmic strategy trading is, and doesn't request an accomplished trader to disclose his strategies. As to why, I said, he will say, and he has said to me, <b><i>"For obvious reasons."
 
Back
Top