I think your premise is false on two counts. First, just because someone trades in the direction of a perceived trend does not mean that he will necessarily allow a trade to go against him any more so than a "countertrend" trader would. That is simply an assumption you made.Quote from chewbacca:
trend trading requires big balls
how big?
so big you qualify as a handicapped person
why?
because 50-99% retracements are very common and not many people can watch a 2000 gain shrink to a 200 gain or before it turns into a 4000 gain
countertrend trading is child's play - it is conventional wisdom - buy low, sell high
And second, who is to say that an initial protective stop need necessarily be larger for a "trend" trade than for a "countertrend" trade? I think that trend identification and timing play a fairly pivotal role.
Bottom line: one approach need not necessarily be looser than the other. Both participants can choose to play a tight game.
