Trend Funds Destroyed in 2012

Let's look at monthly gold chart as an example. Obviously, it's rangebound during the last couple of years... but what about before? :)

Guess any speculative approach has periods of good and bad performance, that's inevitable and good/bad years also depend on time scale at which a particular fund operates...

Don't see any reasons why some instruments can't have huge trends any time in future.
 

Attachments

Quote from nkhoi:

you didn't follow the right trend follower, try this guy Dr. Wish
QLD Portfolio +30.81%
http://dark-liquidity.com/WishingWeal] [/B][/QUOTE] You know he is a paper trader, right?
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

What is the evidence of Al Brook's success? He claims to be a medical doctor, but runs chatrooms on the side? thanks! surf

evidently he wasn't a successful doctor :D
 
Quote from nkhoi:

not, he trades his IRA account.


You can't be serious. You are using a guy who trades in his IRA account ( like everyone else) to refute the performance of the giant, trend following funds? You do understand the difference, right?

surf:eek:
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

You can't be serious. You are using a guy who trades in his IRA account ( like everyone else) to refute the performance of the giant, trend following funds? You do understand the difference, right?

surf:eek:
his students run funds for him.
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

Here are the final numbers for the "trend followers" for 2012. Looks like everyone guessed wrong. One more year like this, and its the final nail in the coffin of this outdated and senseless method.

chesapeake -17.8
dunn -18.6
eckhardt +3.9
hawksbill -13.6
hyman beck -19.6
millburn -5.3
rabar -14.3
sunrise -20.0
transtrend +0.7


surf

So everyone should just buy funds, that you sell?
 
Back
Top