Quote from marketsurfer:
one would need to know how many "trend following" funds failed miserably by picking the wrong direction before surviorship biased statements like this make any sense.
these guys have have tremendous drawdowns, just like buy/sell and hope ( which is exactly what trend following is) --- some make it, most don't. extrapolating that its a viable strategy for traders to use based on a few successes is a stretch to say the least.
surf
Quote from asap:
like i said it only works in hindsight.
you dont know whether these same funds will blow up in the next decade. in fact, chances are they will since they have done so well in the past and in the long run every single strategy reverts to its mean.
Quote from asap:
what's this?
the royal guard of the EMA50,200 cross holy grail?![]()
Quote from asiaprop:
what a poor argument.
Why in hindsight? They generated money for their investors. Most funds permitted their investors to have taken their money and live a happy life at any time. What problem do you have with that?
Mean reversion? Just because you are the oldest and were born being above average intelligent your younger sister must be very dumb, mean reversion. A pair of stocks is out 3 standard deviations from its long term mean, they must surely come back so go and put on the trade no other questions asked...come on such lame way of thinking has bankrupted so many guys.
Quote from EPrado:
Nah. I dont trade using moving averages. But if it works for those who do then great.
I just laugh at idiots who say trend following doesnt work. They are by far the most sucessful group over the long run. (Trend followers that is.....not the idiots).
Keep chasing those nickels in front of steamrollers like Neiderhoffer did. A tremendous strategy...really.