And the saga continues. Covel writes another book, and he is at a loss when asked what new and additionally useful content is covered in his new book compared to the previous Trend Following book. The repetition of one non sequitur after another, while revealing, does not actually answer the question. The question becomes that much more poignant when one considers that Covel regards trend following to be defined in a rather precise and limited way, as evidenced in the preceding posts on that subject. And so, against the background of a singular and static definition of the term, a thinking person can't help but ask what relevant and applicable information is contained in the new trend following book that was not already covered in the previous book. Meanwhile, the sound, the fury, and the non sequitur responses continue. Gosh, doesn't it just feel so right to buy a book from this guy?