Trend Following Research

Quote from kut2k2:

You're being deliberately obtuse. I already said the same thing you did in different words. Trend followers expect the price to (continue to) rise because it was already rising. BTW how can the price be rising when, according to you and Seykota, there's no such thing as a current trend? Are you familiar with the word "contradiction"?

Go re-read his last sentence. Do we have to pull out the dictionary?
 
Quote from Trend Following:

Seykota's wisdom is clear and concise. You sound like you are tied in a knot with your choice of words. Do you not see that distinction at least?
Seykota's "wisdom" is sophistry. Did you at least look up Zeno's arrow paradox to see what I was referring to?
 
Quote from Trend Following:

Don't be such a weenie. Here is the quote:



Prove it wrong. You got to read his words. Pretty straightforward. Don't forget the last sentence.
when you started typing this sentence after the p in prove ,you were in a trend to the right as you continued to type,you were in a trend in the present, not the philosophical ,,magical,mystical past ,just the simple factual present
 
Quote from kut2k2:

Seykota's "wisdom" is sophistry. Did you at least look up Zeno's arrow paradox to see what I was referring to?

Many market gurus, cult leaders and psychics use this same tactic. I'm surprised the sophisticated folks on this site don't get this obvious fact....

Another thing I learned is just because someone is wealthy from the market, doesn't mean they are smarter or even know more than you or I About the market or anything else. Money doesn't discriminate.
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

Many market gurus, cult leaders and psychics use this same tactic. I'm surprised the sophisticated folks on this site don't get this obvious fact....

Another thing I learned is just because someone is wealthy from the market, doesn't mean they are smarter or even know more than you or I About the market or anything else. Money doesn't discriminate.

I only posted his quotation cause it was true. No other reason.

There is no trend 'now'.

Trend exists between some defined point A and B.

Figure a way to measure between A and B.

Figure a way once it is measured -- to profit from it.

Arguing against that, which is all his line says, is bizarre to me.
 
Zeno's arrow paradox

dx = v * dt

integrating both sides:

S dx = S v*dt
x = S v*dt

If the trend is composed of current price, and current price has no trend because its one point in time by itself , than we conclude each price exists by itself in a fixed interval of time (which can be infinitely small) and therefore trends do not exist.--(lol)

By comparing the current price to the price point in the past we can determine trends..

Current price > Reference = Up trend
Current price < Reference = Down Trend

it takes 2 price points to determine the trend (duh)

kut2k is right , Seykota over-philosophies at times...

I dunno why I even posted this, what the heck is the point?, we should instead be posting some Donchian studies or something.

Mr Covel, do you have any papers on Donchian?, I have tried to search online for his letters etc, but only found his rules. I am sure you got some stuff on the father of trend following.
newsletter Commodity Trend Timing?
articles Trend Following Methods in Commodity Price Analysis.?
 
Quote from slavduja:

Zeno's arrow paradox

dx = v * dt

integrating both sides:

S dx = S v*dt
x = S v*dt

If the trend is composed of current price, and current price has no trend because its one point in time by itself , than we conclude each price exists by itself in a fixed interval of time (which can be infinitely small) and therefore trends do not exist.--(lol)

By comparing the current price to the price point in the past we can determine trends..

Current price > Reference = Up trend
Current price < Reference = Down Trend
it takes 2 price points to determine the trend (duh)

kut2k is right , Seykota over-philosophies at times...

I dunno why I even posted this, what the heck is the point?, we should instead be posting some Donchian studies or something.

Mr Covel, do you have any papers on Donchian?, I have tried to search online for his letters etc, but only found his rules. I am sure you got some stuff on the father of trend following.
newsletter Commodity Trend Timing?
articles Trend Following Methods in Commodity Price Analysis.?

It is very important to recognize the mistakes in Seykota's statement.

The main clues are found in the Behavioral Finance piece just below the Introduction on the home page of Behavioral Finance.

It is really important to NOT do trend following and do trend monitoring and Analysis. It this effort, time is NOt the independent variable. What IS the independent variable is "events". Of the two classes, one has duration in terms of time; the other does not.

Events form trends. Events follow a specific invariant order of events.

Thus, through trend monitoring and analysis you know three things:

1. What is happening in the Present;

2. What is next in the order of events; and

3. How fast (in time) events are changing.

I don't care about others views nor judge those people because I practice trend monitoring and analysis well beyond the limits of the belief systems of any on ET (vendors, like Covel or retailers). Trend following never was my practice; my orientation is extracting the market's offer.

When the event named "continuing" is going on (measurably) I hold to take the full offer from the market; when the event named "change" has its brief moment (measurably), I reverse to be on the correct side of the market's upcoming "continuing". All events has prescribed pre and post measurable characteristics.

Hence I espouse a pattern: B2B 2R 2B for long profit segments and R2R 2B 2R for short profit segments.

Covel correctly calls this "gibberish" and he calls Seykota precise, etc. because he has a permanent problem. I do not have Covel's or others' problem(s).

Trend following "research" is a mistaken quest.

As I have said before, I have no interest in whether a person likes me or my chosen trading persuasion. What I do proves Seykota and Covel and others with like views are incorrect in their views.
 
Quote from jack hershey:

It is very important to recognize the mistakes in Seykota's statement.

The main clues are found in the Behavioral Finance piece just below the Introduction on the home page of Behavioral Finance.

It is really important to NOT do trend following and do trend monitoring and Analysis. It this effort, time is NOt the independent variable. What IS the independent variable is "events". Of the two classes, one has duration in terms of time; the other does not.

Events form trends. Events follow a specific invariant order of events.

Thus, through trend monitoring and analysis you know three things:

1. What is happening in the Present;

2. What is next in the order of events; and

3. How fast (in time) events are changing.

I don't care about others views nor judge those people because I practice trend monitoring and analysis well beyond the limits of the belief systems of any on ET (vendors, like Covel or retailers). Trend following never was my practice; my orientation is extracting the market's offer.

When the event named "continuing" is going on (measurably) I hold to take the full offer from the market; when the event named "change" has its brief moment (measurably), I reverse to be on the correct side of the market's upcoming "continuing". All events has prescribed pre and post measurable characteristics.

Hence I espouse a pattern: B2B 2R 2B for long profit segments and R2R 2B 2R for short profit segments.

Covel correctly calls this "gibberish" and he calls Seykota precise, etc. because he has a permanent problem. I do not have Covel's or others' problem(s).

Trend following "research" is a mistaken quest.

As I have said before, I have no interest in whether a person likes me or my chosen trading persuasion. What I do proves Seykota and Covel and others with like views are incorrect in their views.

Indeed, behavior is what causes trends, volume measures the degree, time measures the intensity, nothing more, nothing less.
 
Quote from jack hershey:


The main clues are found in the Behavioral Finance piece just below the Introduction on the home page of Behavioral Finance.


Events form trends. Events follow a specific invariant order of events.

Thus, through trend monitoring and analysis you know three things:

1. What is happening in the Present;

2. What is next in the order of events; and

3. How fast (in time) events are changing.


http://www.behaviouralfinance.net/psychology-of-successful-investing.pdf


When the event named "continuing" is going on (measurably) I hold to take the full offer from the market; when the event named "change" has its brief moment (measurably), I reverse to be on the correct side of the market's upcoming "continuing". All events has prescribed pre and post measurable characteristics.

Hence I espouse a pattern: B2B 2R 2B for long profit segments and R2R 2B 2R for short profit segments.

What are R2R and 2B stand for??



Trend following "research" is a mistaken quest.

As I have said before, I have no interest in whether a person likes me or my chosen trading persuasion. What I do proves Seykota and Covel and others with like views are incorrect in their views.

I like you jack, but that's a WILD statement, if you really think trend following is shit, why you on this thread??
Yah sure introducing fundamentals and ROC and volume analysis could probably enhance Pure Price action trend following system, but since TA was first practiced Trend Following has consistently produced good results.


The most fundamental
bias, therefore, is the status quo bias (also known as conservatism).
Any living person may ruminate: I have
survived thus far, everything that I have already experienced cannot be fatal
because I am alive. For example, I have never eaten that berry before, and
I have survived, so why should I risk eating it now?

From the Paper
Why try and reinvent the wheel?or fix that which is not broken??
I aint smart enough to do that so I look for an ANCHOR to build on. Trend following is one of those anchors

Time to go out its Friday night and I am in my mid 20s, why stay home?? right

Cao
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

Indeed, behavior is what causes trends, volume measures the degree, time measures the intensity, nothing more, nothing less.


Huh? Behavior or capital causes "trends" ?

How do you know how those with market moving capital are going to behave?

Please read winner take all by Gallacher for more details

Trend only matters after the directional entry.

Still awaiting real time calls based on trend idea.

I have been providing calls on surf report without any acknowledgement of trend.

Fortunate so far y dont you or your team post a few? keep it simple and keep clear of those who speak in riddles and uri geller types. Real time calls only discount all else Thanks
 
Back
Top