I wonder the same when I see business school professors selling MBA courses and business books.Quote from Roark:If trend following is so phucking profitable, why does the OP find it necessary to sell so much over-priced crap?
Quote from Trend Following:
What is this 'bring out the gimp' time?
Everyone learns from someone ... and learning does not mean 'submission'.
Quote from Roark:
Check out the OP's website. It's hilarious:
<img src="http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=3100765">
If trend following is so phucking profitable, why does the OP find it necessary to sell so much over-priced crap?

Quote from ProfLogic:
Jack,
Nice to see you breathing.
Our resident multi-alias multi-banned hedge-fund-hog started a thread this morning that you died.
Luckily the mods deleted it and canned him again. Hopefully soon they will ban his IP once and for all.

Quote from RCG Trader:
Actually, if you are going to learn efficiently it does. In the medical field for one example you do not question your professors or your preceptors. Do it the way it is taught or you will not practice.
The same would be true if you are going to learn a technical skill like trading. Not being submissive to Dennis is the reason many Turtles washed, but since you do not do anything technical I would guess you have a lot of latitude.
Quote from Trend Following:
Medical analogy to trend trading is bogus.
The 4 Turtles who determined that Dennis was using the wrong risk management rules ... they were not 'submissive' were they? If they would have just trusted Dennis (as you propose), there may have never been a Turtle trading lesson/legend. Their work generated this:
![]()
Dennis clearly would have been much better off in the long run if he followed Eckhardt's lead.

Quote from Trend Following:
What are you trying to say? What is the distinction you think you are drawing?