Trend Following Research

Quote from kut2k2:

Somebody put it in print back in 1837. Whether or not that person was Ricardo is irrelevant, because it sure as hell wasn't Gann. :D

Well I can see due diligence is not your cup of tea, so I will just let it go at that.
 
Quote from kut2k2:

Somebody put it in print back in 1837. Whether or not that person was Ricardo is irrelevant, because it sure as hell wasn't Gann.

My TF is based primarily on MAs. You're not claiming Gann invented MAs, are you?

Gann angles are the progenitors of MAs absolutely.
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

Well I can see due diligence is not your cup of tea, so I will just let it go at that.
You've yet to show how all of trend following flows from Gann, so I'll just let it go at that. :D
 
Quote from Trend Following:

Trying to verify facts. Is there any way to verify any of the above except taking you at your word? Who was the Swiss group? Which Swiss University? Where is the paper you presented?

The paper is my book.
All of the information, in regards to the constant volume bar structure, environments and their use, is found on this site so you don't have to get the book (I'll take that attack away from you before you make it). Many, and I mean many, have found all of the hard core information here, applied it and found the information extremely useful.

There are only two Universities in Zürich but the group isn't directly associated with either University. They simply utilize their resources as most businesses do to local colleges.

The group is irrelevant. What is relevant is the information. Validate it for yourself as being worthwhile or worthless, period.
If you are truly concerned about the validity of the information. Test it yourself. If you are simply looking at taking the information out of context as your journalistic friend has done in the past then research & testing is something you will not ever do. God forbid you test it and it actually works. You will just spin and spin and spin some more to get out of the work necessary to validate my work or to even disprove it (which isn't possible).
 
Quote from ProfLogic:

The paper is my book.
All of the information, in regards to the constant volume bar structure, environments and their use, is found on this site so you don't have to get the book (I'll take that attack away from you before you make it). Many, and I mean many, have found all of the hard core information here, applied it and found the information extremely useful.

There are only two Universities in Zürich but the group isn't directly associated with either University. They simply utilize their resources as most businesses do to local colleges.

The group is irrelevant. What is relevant is the information. Validate it for yourself as being worthwhile or worthless, period.
If you are truly concerned about the validity of the information. Test it yourself. If you are simply looking at taking the information out of context as your journalistic friend has done in the past then research & testing is something you will not ever do. God forbid you test it and it actually works. You will just spin and spin and spin some more to get out of the work necessary to validate my work or to even disprove it (which isn't possible).

And this post Mr. Covel is the Crux Ansata of the real argument here. All of the info that Jack and Bill put out is in the public domain. Connie charges 55 dollars for a book, but her assertions are within that single text as well. The only person out solely to make money selling "education" is you. Bill trades, I have traded with him before. Spyder trades, and he is Jack's "number one" so to speak, so I can safely say that Jack trades also. Connie trades, and runs a fund.......

What exactly do you do, Mr. Covel?
 
Quote from ProfLogic:

The paper is my book.

Not out yet?

Quote from ProfLogic:

All of the information, in regards to the constant volume bar structure, environments and their use, is found on this site so you don't have to get the book (I'll take that attack away from you before you make it). Many, and I mean many, have found all of the hard core information here, applied it and found the information extremely useful.

Who?

Quote from ProfLogic:

There are only two Universities in Zürich but the group isn't directly associated with either University. They simply utilize their resources as most businesses do to local colleges. The group is irrelevant.

It is relevant if someone is trying to validate your claim of being nominated for a Nobel Prize.
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

Gann angles are the progenitors of MAs absolutely.
You are aware, no doubt, that by changng the vertical scale of a price chart, you alter whatever angle you are looking at. In this way, a vendor need not even bother to cherry pick his charts. He needs only to alter the vertical scale, by either stretching or squeezing it, to make it look magical.
 
Quote from kut2k2:

Sorry but this is delusional. MAs have nothing to do with angles.

Again, you have no knowledge of that which u speak, so I will allow u to call me delusional and move on.

Thank you for the discourse.
 
Quote from Gabfly1:

You are aware, no doubt, that by changng the vertical scale of a price chart, you alter whatever angle you are looking at. In this way, a vendor need not even bother to cherry pick his charts. He needs only to alter the vertical scale to make it look magical.

Proper angles are mathematically fixed, that is why they are moving averages. One unit of price by one unit of time. it does not matter how the chart is compressed or stretched, the values will remain the same.
 
Back
Top