Quote from alesanti:
Why do you think that the trend following is a flawed theory? I think that to qualify a theory as flawed (as well as to sustain it) you have to have quantitative reasons. I was interested in the book because I think that trends are ubiquitous in trading and I hope that this author can bring an explanation (I mean a quantitaive one, or a one sustained by statistics). I don't know if he provides something like this.
Not being a trader, for me, does not diqualifies him to do some research on trend following theory.
i'll be happy to answer you. trend following , as defined by the book's author, when tested shows results a random fashion. there is no edge to buying higher highs, or selling lower lows. how many movements in one direction ( any time frame ) increase the probability that the next movement will be in the same direction? if a flipped coin comes up heads 10 times in a row, are you in a heads trend?
the author does not shed light on your question, however, the book is entertaining.
this has been discussed ad nauseum on elite. do a search, if you want to learn more.
surf