Trend Following dying?

[Mr_Black]

there was no fill@ 10325 the price dive from 10311 to 10280

 

[rainman2]

Quote from TIKITRADER:

Jack,


When entering a non dom of a dom(3rd) of the first dominant . . . dom container I would soon look for change, but in the bigger picture I am still holding
throughout the next non dom of the 3 part to build a completed dominant move and this requires a return to dominant and finally looking for change in the final dominant
of the final dominant after identifying the non dominant of this sub dominant move.
is this correct ?

Thanks

Yes TIKI, great work...IMO, you are absolutely correct. Just be careful that the sub dominant of the final dominant doesn't fall into a zone that would cause the NSW to continue to shift into the white zone. At that point, drilling down into the sub sub level should be part of your MADA.

hope that helps.

 

[romanus]

Quote from Mr_Black:

there was no fill@ 10325 the price dive from 10311 to 10280

 

[rainman2]

Quote from rainman2:

Yes TIKI, great work...IMO, you are absolutely correct. Just be careful that the sub dominant of the final dominant doesn't fall into a zone that would cause the NSW to continue to shift into the white zone. At that point, drilling down into the sub sub level should be part of your MADA.

hope that helps.

Here's an example on shifted.

 

[Mr_Black]

The hold was part of thick red line fractal

 

[romanus]

Quote from Mr_Black:

The hold was part of thick red line fractal

Thank you very much.

 

[Trader666]

The reason is, hindsight! Just like he used hindsight to magically enter at a different level when the level he originally said he'd enter at wasn't hit. That entire "trade" was posted after-the-fact.

Study harder. Dedicate yourself more. Burn your old 3-ring binders and start again from scratch reading each of Jack's posts a minimum of 50 times.

Quote from romanus:

 

[Trader666]

This entire "trade" was posted after-the-fact.

Of course you magically entered at a different level when the level you originally said you would enter at wasn't hit. And of course you made a profit... ALL IN HINDSIGHT! You've got the Hershey "method" down pat

Quote from Mr_Black:

there was no fill@ 10325 the price dive from 10311 to 10280

 

[thisisnotsurfer]

 

[romanus]

Quote from Trader666:

The reason is, hindsight! Just like he used hindsight to magically enter at a different level when the level he originally said he'd enter at wasn't hit. That entire "trade" was posted after-the-fact.

Study harder. Dedicate yourself more. Burn your old 3-ring binders and start again from scratch reading each of Jack's posts a minimum of 50 times.

Actually the reason for his hold through what I perceived to be a change signal on his trading fractal is quite clear, and it was very clear even before I posted my question. I just didn't see it until Mr. Black's answer, despite the fact that elsewhere another person posted earlier with respect to a similar context. As far as the logic for his entry, it is also very clear and clearly visible in real time. A practinioner made multiple real time calls in this thread and provided an explanation for those who are interested - I definitely learned something that I was missing before.