Tremors through the Republican Party

jem said:
As an american...

It is unacceptable to let someone for open borders, open trade and understands there will be jihadists among the immigrants let in... to take the oath of office for President because as she was taking the oath to defend america and the constitution she would be lying.
More...

I see no evidence that the US has more "open borders" and "open trade" then it did in the 1980s or 1990s. What are you basing your ideas on, other then Trump sound bites when he isn't otherwise lying about something ?

As Canadians, we understand that if we let Americans through our border that some of them will be violent in nature and prone to gun crime. We don't punish the vast majority because of the worst offenders. However, if the US was to become extremely protectionist and take an extreme fortress like approach to borders, many other nations will retaliate in kind I'm sure. I read that Hoover tried this approach to trade in 1930 and it didn't work out well.

I highly doubt Trump gets elected; I see a lot of noise but I think he lost ages ago and most woman voters will do what they usually do, quietly go about their business ignoring obnoxious males and vote as they planned all along.
 
1. everyone in California and texas and big cities knows we have 2 to 4 times as many illegal immigrants know than we had in the 90s. There is probably 10 million in so cal alone.
so this 10 million number was never based on anything concrete.

2. open borders stands for out of control legal immigration too. Hillary said in her wikileaks that she is for open borders and understands there are going to be jihadists mixed in.
2 she said she wants to expand immigration from the middle east.

3. But for evidence all you have to know is that we just hit and all time high. 40 million immigrants are now citizens who also have 20 million kids. That is more immigration that any country in the world. add what 20 to 30 illegal immigrants....

before you state there is no evidence of open borders... do the research.

4. Regarding trade polices. just prior to the great depression we were an exporter. Europe was an importer. Europe put up trader barriers and saw a much milder recession than our depression.

5. I am concerned that trump just lost. he was winning among independents by a large margin. I wonder if that lead will hold.

Nine_Ender said:
I see no evidence that the US has more "open borders" and "open trade" then it did in the 1980s or 1990s. What are you basing your ideas on, other then Trump sound bites when he isn't otherwise lying about something ?

As Canadians, we understand that if we let Americans through our border that some of them will be violent in nature and prone to gun crime. We don't punish the vast majority because of the worst offenders. However, if the US was to become extremely protectionist and take an extreme fortress like approach to borders, many other nations will retaliate in kind I'm sure. I read that Hoover tried this approach to trade in 1930 and it didn't work out well.

I highly doubt Trump gets elected; I see a lot of noise but I think he lost ages ago and most woman voters will do what they usually do, quietly go about their business ignoring obnoxious males and vote as they planned all along.
More...
 
jem said:
1. And concentrations of the newer, ozone-friendly gases are also rising meteorically, because industrialized countries began switching to them a decade ago. New room air-conditioners in the United States now use an HFC coolant called 410a, labeled “environmentally friendly” because it spares the ozone. But its warming effect is 2,100 times that of carbon dioxide. And the treaty cannot control the rise of these coolants because it regulates only ozone-depleting gases.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/21/w...oning-forces-tough-environmental-choices.html


2. I don't know how they would react. NASA studies show co2 acts a thermostat sometimes acting to cause cooling and sometimes causing warming. What the data shows us is that co2 levels lag but follow changes in ocean temps. We don't know that those levels change because we add add co2. The earth could process it or off gas the extra co2.

the bomb test studies call into question all your sides assumptions (the bern convention) about how co2 behaves in the earths eco system.
More...


You are right about one thing in this post. You don't how would they react.

And there is no science showing CO2 cools the planet. You are laughably wrong. Like Trump level wrong,
 
Ricter said:
Please show the science supporting "2000 times more powerful than CO2".
More...

Let's take a look at Global Warming Potential (GWP). This research is put forward from some of the leading scientists supporting AGW.

Carbon dioxide has a GWP of exactly 1 (since it is the baseline unit to which all other greenhouse gases are compared).

Freon and its variants (R134,etc.) are HFC-134a (hydrofluorocarbons). It has a GWP of 3790 over a 20 year timeframe, and a GWP of 1550 over a 100 year timeframe.

Jem has been understating the case. Futurecurrents pedals a chemical that is 3790 times more powerful than CO2 in eyes of AGW theory.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming_potential
 
Who gives a fuck.

What guy hasn't talked about women that way?

I fucked her. I banged her good. Grabbed her pussy.

If you haven't said that as a guy, you're probably a fag.
 
nitro said:
:wtf:
More...
Seriously dude. You never fucked a woman before?

All these puritanical assholes down in America. They talk real sweet like Weiner, then whip out their cock out when the cameras are off.

We all talk like this.

We all dont RAPE WOMEN and cover it up tho, do we?

Big fucking difference.

You support the accomplice of a rapist?

You support that scumbag?
 
achilles28 said:
Seriously dude. You never fucked a woman before?

All these puritanical assholes down in America. They talk real sweet like Weiner, then whip out their cock out when the cameras are off.

We all talk like this.

We all dont RAPE WOMEN and cover it up tho, do we?

Big fucking difference.

You support the accomplice of a rapist?

You support that scumbag?
More...
:wtf::wtf:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top