Tremors through the Republican Party

Nitro my man, you guys never learn. You're overselling the case and that ecposes your desperation. Just like the overzealous PC prosecutor who overcharges and then loses the case you may find your candidate in the same position. Trump is a billionaire playboy, mac daddy playa'. You're trying to paint him as some serial rapist who now wants to cowboy ride a nuke and take us all into oblivion. That just may backfire if he can play it right tomorrow
 
Nitro my man, you guys never learn. You're overselling the case and that ecposes your desperation. Just like the overzealous PC prosecutor who overcharges and then loses the case you may find your candidate in the same position. Trump is a billionaire playboy, mac daddy playa'. You're trying to paint him as some serial rapist who now wants to cowboy ride a nuke and take us all into oblivion. That just may backfire if he can play it right tomorrow
Backfire? If the truth backfires, then so be it. If you see a different truth than I do, what can I say.

I have faith in the majority of the American population that they see what I see, but if they don't, then our democratic process has played its role, and must be respected come November 8 and on inauguration day January 17.
 
How is it going to backfire when instead of strategic thinking the guy is still occupying his time with issues like this!


Donald Trump Still Thinks The Central Park Five Are Guilty (They Aren’t)

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump still believes the “Central Park Five,” a group of black and Hispanic men who were convicted but later exonerated in the 1989 rape of a female jogger in New York City’s Central Park, are guilty, he told CNN this week. The news comes more than a decade after the men were cleared by DNA evidence and a confession by the actual culprit about his role in the crime.

They admitted they were guilty,” Trump told CNN’s Miguel Marquez. “The police doing the original investigation say they were guilty. The fact that that case was settled with so much evidence against them is outrageous. And the woman, so badly injured, will never be the same.”
 
I find this extremely hard to believe. Trump strikes me as a womanizer, but child rapist? I doubt it.

OCTOBER 4, 2016

LAWSUIT CLAIMING DONALD TRUMP RAPED A 13-YEAR-OLD GIRL REFILED IN NEW YORK COURT — NEW WITNESS COMES FORWARD
CHRISSIE WILLIAMS


Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/3562837/la...ew-witness-comes-forward/#HvEzQ5BYl2L8PAV8.99

A lawsuit accusing Donald Trump of repeatedly raping a 13-year-old girl has been refiled in New York court with a new witness, Occupy Democrats reports. The allegation against Trump occurred over 20 years ago when Donald attended a series of parties thrown by convicted sex offender and billionaire investor Jeffrey Epstein. Jeffrey had a reputation for throwing sex parties with underage girls.

A third eyewitness, “Jane Doe,” joined the lawsuit and can allegedly place Donald Trump in at least one of Epstein’s parties. Donald Trump’s campaign has denied any and all implications that he was involved in the rape of the young girl in question. Trump previously stated that he has known Jeffrey for 15 years and touted how much fun they had in social events, especially with “young girls.”

“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

“Jane Doe” claims that Donald and Jeffrey not only raped her, but they also threatened to kill her family if she told anyone. She feared for her life and kept quiet about her alleged experience for 20 years, Snopes reports.

“I understood that both Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein knew I was 13 years old. Defendant Trump had sexual contact with me at four different parties in the summer of 1994. On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump tied me to a bed, exposed himself to me and then proceeded to forcibly rape me. During the course of this savage sexual attack, I loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but he did not. Defendant Trump responded to my pleas by violently striking me in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened me that, were I ever to reveal any of the details of Defendant Trump’s sexual and physical abuse of me, my family and I wold be physically harmed if not killed.”

Alan Garten, general counsel for Trump Organization, stated that “Jane Doe’s” claims about Donald “are completely frivolous and appear to be politically motivated.”

A second witness named “Tiffany Doe” came forward alleging that she witnessed Epstein and Trump rape the plaintiff on multiple occasions. A third witness named “Joan Doe” reports that the plaintiff stated she was sexually active with Trump and Epstein during the summer of 1994.

“In the 1994-95 school year, I was told by the plaintiff in Jane Doe v. Trump and Epstein (1:16-cv-04642, SDNY) that the plaintiff was subject to sexual contact by the Defendants at parties in New York City during the summer of 1994.”

Donald’s lawyer claims that the allegations against him are false and seem to be aimed at smearing his “good” name, and they plan to fight the lawsuit in every possible way.


Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/3562837/la...ew-witness-comes-forward/#HvEzQ5BYl2L8PAV8.99

Of course, all three women could be lying about Trump, in a plot to smear his name to give Hillary Clinton a boost in the election. Winning Democrats report that the women are not using the lawsuit to “get famous” as Trump’s attorney implied. They did not use their real names and requested to stay anonymous. Another fact supporting the lawsuit is when Donald Trump told radio personality Howard Stern a few years ago that he was sexually attracted to Paris Hilton when she was 12 years old — a full year younger than the victim listed in the lawsuit. And, let’s not forget, Donald allegedly made a few very inappropriate sexual comments about his own daughter.

Let’s face it — it doesn’t look good for Donald Trump. Even if he get the case thrown out, America will wonder if the allegations against him were true. Worst of all, the lawsuit could and possibly should cost him the 2016 presidential election.

[Featured Image by Jessica Kourkounis/Getty Images]

Now Read This: Donald Trump’s Personal Army: How Reddit’s The_Donald Morphed From Posting Memes To Harassing Political Targets Online


http://www.inquisitr.com/3562837/la...-in-new-york-court-new-witness-comes-forward/

I am actually surprised the Trump/Epstein connection has not been played more by the democrats. I suppose it is because Bill Clinton liked to hang out with Epstein also. All it proves is that the crowd that Trump ran with was very establishment.
 
I think Hillary should have just canceled the last 2 debates.This race is won and she can only harm herself in debates.Why get on TV and let Trump drag Bill through the mud or risk having one of her health problems during the debate.Just take a knee and run out the clock.
 
Condoleezza Rice: 'Enough! Donald Trump should not be president'

Pamela Engel,Business Insider 2 hours 52 minutes ago
Condoleezza_Rice_Enough_Donald_Trump-6edf4ce44e6aca964604ef91a9fd8c20


Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice slammed Donald Trump in a statement on Saturday as calls mount for the Republican presidential nominee to leave the race.

"Enough! Donald Trump should not be President," she said in a statement posted to her Facebook page. "He should withdraw. As a Republican, I hope to support someone who has the dignity and stature to run for the highest office in the greatest democracy on earth."
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ebe6fc-8da4-11e6-875e-2c1bfe943b66_story.html

A 6-year-old asks: ‘What does it mean to grab somebody by the p---y?’


By Danielle Paquette October 8 at 7:11 PM

The 6-year-old girl turned to her mother and asked, “What does it mean to grab somebody by the p---y?”

Rachael MacIsaac Parker thought she had misheard her daughter. “What?” she recalled responding. “What do you mean?”

Then she saw the television screen. “You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them,” Donald Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, was saying in a 2005 recording. “It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait.”

Fame gave him power over the opposite sex, Trump was bragging to Billy Bush, then the host of “Access Hollywood.”

“Grab them by the p---y,” he said, caught on a hot mic. “You can do anything.”

Parker, an assistant principal at an elementary school in Louisiana, pulled her daughter close. “I told her we needed to talk about our bodies,” she said, “and that sometimes bad people touch our bodies without permission.”

She said her daughter asked if Trump was a bad guy. “What do you even say to that?” she remarked.

The decade-old footage of Trump has upended the presidential campaign since The Washington Post first published it Friday afternoon, prompting dozens of Republicans to call for the candidate to exit the race. But it also has presented parents nationwide with a vexing quandary: how and whether to explain the jarring remarks to their children.

Trump’s comments dominated television and the Internet on Friday night and all of Saturday — a digital universe open to any kid with a device and a connection.

Teddy Mott, a freshman at a high school in the District, first saw part of the transcript on Instagram. Curious, he Googled “Donald Trump” on his iPhone and the phrase “Grab them by the p---y” came up.

He thought, “What?”

“You hear guys at school talking about women, but you don’t hear them talking like that,” Mott, 14, told a reporter as his mother listened. “You hear, ‘Am I out of the doghouse?’ ”

Did the exchange affect his view of women?

He paused to think.

“You respect them as people,” he said. “My mom taught me that. You look at them from afar. You look into their eyes first.”

For some families, the remarks have prompted emotional reactions. Keisha Robinson, an employee at a nonprofit organization in Arizona, said “grab them by the p---y” brought her 18-year-old daughter to tears.

“She came to me and said, ‘Oh, my gosh. Did you hear what he said?’ ” recalled Robinson, 38, a supporter of Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. “She’s terrified about what this means for women. She’s scared people think that behavior is okay.”

Michael Clifford, 37, an author who lives in Los Angeles, said he turns off the television when Trump is talking. “It’s a fatherly instinct to shield them from that negativity,” he said of his two boys, ages 2 and 4 months. “I’ve heard people say, ‘Oh, that’s just real guy talk,’ and that disgusts me. I’ve never hung around guys like that.”
 
So all the republicans who were deadset against Trump all along now are offended and repulsed by some shit talking he did 15 years ago? What a surprise.

Given how clueless voters are, this may well be the final nail in the coffin for him.

They somehow think a couple of incidents involving rude talk are more important than keeping our country open to a flood of tens of millions of immigrants who have no skills except crime and who will immediately go on welfare and file for their extended families to join them. His talk is more important to the future of the country than bringing in hundreds of thousands of fake refugees, who will go on welfare and some percentage of them will be deadly terrorists. More important than the continuing horror of obamacare, or Obama's callous indifference to the suffering of veterans at the hands of the criminally incompetent Veterans Administration.

These same voters are more offended by trump's talk than the obvious corruption of the FBI under Obama. Which is more outrageous, trump's silly boasting or the bogus investigation into Hillary's violation of security and records retention laws, obstruction of justice and selling her office to donors.

We know very well that if the parties were reversed, the media would be screaming about all of Hillary's misdeeds and hissing people to be quiet about Trump. After all, we learned during the Clinton administration that sexual matters are the candidate's personal business, not ours. How many times did we hear that? Guess that only applies if it's a Clinton.
 
So all the republicans who were deadset against Trump all along now are offended and repulsed by some shit talking he did 15 years ago? What a surprise.

Given how clueless voters are, this may well be the final nail in the coffin for him.

They somehow think a couple of incidents involving rude talk are more important than keeping our country open to a flood of tens of millions of immigrants who have no skills except crime and who will immediately go on welfare and file for their extended families to join them. His talk is more important to the future of the country than bringing in hundreds of thousands of fake refugees, who will go on welfare and some percentage of them will be deadly terrorists. More important than the continuing horror of obamacare, or Obama's callous indifference to the suffering of veterans at the hands of the criminally incompetent Veterans Administration.

These same voters are more offended by trump's talk than the obvious corruption of the FBI under Obama. Which is more outrageous, trump's silly boasting or the bogus investigation into Hillary's violation of security and records retention laws, obstruction of justice and selling her office to donors.

We know very well that if the parties were reversed, the media would be screaming about all of Hillary's misdeeds and hissing people to be quiet about Trump. After all, we learned during the Clinton administration that sexual matters are the candidate's personal business, not ours. How many times did we hear that? Guess that only applies if it's a Clinton.

Unfortunately, it doesn't matter tripleA.... what matters is the reality of how the vote is going to go.

Its like me saying NFLX is overvalued. I may be 1000% right... but who f*cking cares? Nobody.

Plan your finances accordingly. Change is coming.
 
Back
Top