Trayvon Martin gun, drug texts released

[Eight]

Personally, I feel that anybody privileged to use public sidewalks should be expected to give an answer for what they are doing if asked. It should be common courtesy to do that. Trayvon didn't do that did he? His black gangsta' pride caused him to attack another citizen and he got blown away.

Pride can ruin ones' whole day sometimes.

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from Eight:

Personally, I feel that anybody privileged to use public sidewalks should be expected to give an answer for what they are doing if asked.

How many of you righties agree with this ? If you're walking on a public sidewalk and a police officer,black man,middle eastern man or latino guy asks what you are doing should you be required to tell them ?

 

[Max E.]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

How many of you righties agree with this ? If you're walking on a public sidewalk and a police officer,black man,middle eastern man or latino guy asks what you are doing should you be required to tell them ?

So you think if someone asks me what i am doing it gives me the right to just beat the shit out of them?

Walk away or tell the guy to fuck off, there is a huge gap between that and mercilessly beating someone.

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from Max E. Pad:



Walk away or tell the guy to fuck off

Trayvon ran off,Zimmeremn said it on the 9-11 call.The dispatcher told Zimmermen not to follow him

 

[bigarrow]

Quote from Lucrum:

And yours is, because you say so?True but irrelevant, there is NOTHING illegal or confrontational about that. true but irrelevantTrue again but also irrelevant, Zimmerman had no obligation legal or otherwise to follow directions from a dispatcherTrue yet again and THIS is exactly why he should never have been charged to begin with and why any competent jury should acquit. He certainly has been in the past, but also irrelevant.

Why can't you state just the facts without your personal opinion commentary? I didn't state my opinion on the facts in any way except for my opinion that the character of Martin and Zimmerman would not be an issue and I could be wrong there because I realize that is just an opinion. And again in my opinion the attorneys will ask what events led up to the shooting, if they do and the judge allows that, then your opinion of that information being irrelevant will be wrong.
And yes it was only my opinion about y'all's common sense judging ability.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from bigarrow:

Why can't you state just the facts without your personal opinion commentary?...

Actually I thought I did. LEGALLY speaking none of your facts are relevant PERIOD
That is not nor was it intended to be opinion.

 

[bigarrow]

Quote from Lucrum:

Actually I thought I did. LEGALLY speaking none of your facts are relevant PERIOD
That is not nor was it intended to be opinion.

So that is your professional legal opinion?

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from bigarrow:

So that your professional legal opinion?

It's not opinion at all, I thought I made that clear.

Refute if you can, I'm all ears. Seriously, I have a keen interest in this area of the law. And I'd be all too happy to learn something new if I'm wrong.

 

[bigarrow]

Quote from Lucrum:

It's not opinion at all, I thought I made that clear.

Refute if you can, I'm all ears. Seriously, I have a keen interest in this area of the law. And I'd be all too happy to learn something new if I'm wrong.

You're the one stating "legal facts" please show the section of Florida law that states these events that led up to the killing are irrelevant. I'm all ears.

 

[pspr]

Quote from bigarrow:

You're the one stating "legal facts" please show the section of Florida law that states these events that led up to the killing are irrelevant. I'm all ears.

You can't show laws supporting the negative, dumbass.

You go find the law(s) that proves Lucrum wrong if you believe they exist. That's where the term "breaking the law" comes from.