Trayvon Martin gun, drug texts released

[LEAPup]

Quote from RCG Trader:

There was a move, it was based on the news of a great Obama recovery! My platform gave me TP signals, not entry signals. My orders were in the market yesterday.

As usual, you guys are a day late and a dollar short.

A major move huh buckwheat? Lol! Not even a single point spy move down from your "major move" post, to this post claiming otherwise. Are you on drugs? I'm not kidding either. Not a single point move. Damn, you're a lying yard ape!

Also, let my firm know about your daily profitability and working midnights on bed pan duty. Yes, the laughing was over the top.

You're one fucked up mess buckwheat! Major move... LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Tsing Tao]

Quote from PiggyBank:

That's not the impression i got, but only he knows what he meant because he is too much of a coward to back up his statement.

Unfortunately, that's his M.O., and I end up being the fool to fall for it in trying to hope that maybe, just this once, he'll try to engage me with some real debate instead of obfuscation.

He'll frequently throw out an ambiguous statement in hopes of deflecting focus from the issue of discussion and confusing his opponent. When questioned on it, he rarely will address it, instead replying something to the extent of "go back and re-read what I said" or "look closer at what I was saying", like there's some air of mystery and secretly brilliant message of philosophy in the text for anyone with the right fucking decoder ring.

Ricter does the same thing, except even he will throw an occasional chart or slice of data he copies from some website without taking the time to understand what it implies.

 

[PiggyBank]

Quote from Tsing Tao:

Unfortunately, that's his M.O., and I end up being the fool to fall for it in trying to hope that maybe, just this once, he'll try to engage me with some real debate instead of obfuscation.

He'll frequently throw out an ambiguous statement in hopes of deflecting focus from the issue of discussion and confusing his opponent. When questioned on it, he rarely will address it, instead replying something to the extent of "go back and re-read what I said" or "look closer at what I was saying", like there's some air of mystery and secretly brilliant message of philosophy in the text for anyone with the right fucking decoder ring.

Ricter does the same thing, except even he will throw an occasional chart or slice of data he copies from some website without taking the time to understand what it implies.

well said, he is a fucking waste of time.

if I wrote something that came across differently than I intended, I would (and have) clarify what i meant when it was brought to my attention.. because that is the only way to get the point across. his nonsensical excuse of a reply just makes it seem like he meant what he said but doesn't want to admit it cause he can't back it up. he's a joke.

 

[Ricter]

Quote from Tsing Tao:

Unfortunately, that's his M.O., and I end up being the fool to fall for it

You start as a fool, you don't "end up" there.

 

[LEAPup]

Quote from Tsing Tao:

Unfortunately, that's his M.O., and I end up being the fool to fall for it in trying to hope that maybe, just this once, he'll try to engage me with some real debate instead of obfuscation.

He'll frequently throw out an ambiguous statement in hopes of deflecting focus from the issue of discussion and confusing his opponent. When questioned on it, he rarely will address it, instead replying something to the extent of "go back and re-read what I said" or "look closer at what I was saying", like there's some air of mystery and secretly brilliant message of philosophy in the text for anyone with the right fucking decoder ring.

Ricter does the same thing, except even he will throw an occasional chart or slice of data he copies from some website without taking the time to understand what it implies.

Rcg's too dumb to know what obfuscation even means.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Quote from Ricter:

You start as a fool, you don't "end up" there.

You're right. I fall for it time and time again, so I guess I am the fool for believing either you or he has anything worthwhile to contribute - ever.

I'll probably fall for it again in the near future. The issue is that I just can't believe jackasses like yourself exist without serious typing impediments.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Quote from PiggyBank:

well said, he is a fucking waste of time.

if I wrote something that came across differently than I intended, I would (and have) clarify what i meant when it was brought to my attention.. because that is the only way to get the point across. his nonsensical excuse of a reply just makes it seem like he meant what he said but doesn't want to admit it cause he can't back it up. he's a joke.

They both are.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Tsing Tao:

They both are.

Ditto

 

[Ricter]

Quote from Tsing Tao:

They both are.

And yet, you continue. So maybe there's something here you need.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Quote from Ricter:

And yet, you continue. So maybe there's something here you need.

I am a sucker for a lost cause.