Hey Mickey, how has your research going in a fresh look at the fibs? I am referring to the thread you started on fibs awhile back.
Yeah, Fibs I looked into, spent a few weeks looking at it and created my own notes and spreadsheet.
Basically the conclusion I came to; highly subjective, very hit and miss. Its a bit like what I see on ET where a guy will post a chart of numerous trend lines, they nearly all hit price at some stage and it looks obvious in hindsight, but nigh impossible to trade in foresight, without incurring large amount of losses.
I look at things like Gann, EW, Fibs etc and they have something in common, complicated, subjective but look obvious in hindsight.
I'm not a believer in trading repeating itself via spirals, moon phases, magic numbers, magic repeatable sequences.
I've devised a much simpler system which works, I suspect institutions use, as there are nearly always strong reactions at my calculated levels.
When there is no reaction at the level, nearly always false breakout.
Mentioned in a prior post, finding something simple which works is very difficult.