Quote from pitbulltrader:
It's really quite simple.....we are looking for proof that the calls are taken by any member or that they can do as well as they say......lets not recap this whole thread....THEY DO NOT TRADE AND YOU DON"T HAVE PROOF EITHER
Ok Pitbull let's talk about this like adults shall we? I promise to not do any name calling and I'll try to see if I can grasp what you are after. But in fairness you have to do the same.
First of all, I think one of the biggest issues here is really what proof is enough proof for you?
I stated quite clearly that I have used the method for the bulk of my trading for the last about 5 months.
If I were to send you copies of my statements for that period of time even without covering any personal details, how does that PROVE to you that I took those trades based on the Zoo methods?
You see where I'm going here? I could send you those profitable statements but before I do that I am curious how is that proof to you?
If you were involved with the zoo you would know there are over a dozen setups they use, so if one or two or five are called in the room as part of the official record there might be another 10 that day that are simply called and not taken by Sam, but are by other members.
So just to recap and see that I am on the right track here, what you are looking for or what you would consider REAL proof is if someone could show statements that mirror exactly the trades that show in the official track record?
I just don't see how any other statement could possibly be enough proof for you, if I'm incorrect please do let me know.
Your just here to try and shift the focus...it isn't about a flimsy one week free trial where the calls are so quick that NOBODY can match them....
I disagree I am not here to shift anything I simply asked some questions you replied and I'm doing my best to understand what the issue is.
As for the calls, I took the one week trial. I watched the calls for the first day, they had a high level of success. I took the calls for the last four days, trading 8 contracts and paid for the 6k fee. Again there is no way I can prove that to you, so I don't really know how this will ever be solved to your satisfaction.
There is NO doubt that sometimes the calls in the room are NOT ones that if you are ONLY relying on the call (IOW you are not seeing setups yourself) you will NOT be able to get the same price as someone reading the setups on their own. But that of course should change over time as you become more aware of what you are looking for.
This is about alerting people to "ask the tough questions".
I agree with you 100% NOBODY should plunk down 6k, hell 1k screw that, nobody should plunk one penny down on any trading method, or course etc.. without having all THEIR questions answered. Nothing could be more true.
But this brings me right back to point number one. You say you want statements but is that really going to be enough? I ask that in all honesty. If I send you four or five months of statements how does that prove to YOU or anyone else that the profitable trades there were with the methods I am saying they were? I just want to be clear on what makes sense to you.
That we now have proof that Geox is on this and other forums spewing forth his vile and trying to generate vendor business for the ZOO....He is doing this under many names...
I don't care about I have no involvement, I don't recruit I don't want any referral fees etc. I have suggested to ONE friend they have a look at the methods of the Zoo. They did, they liked what they saw they signed up I did NOT receive ONE PENNY of referral fee or finders fee whatever you would like to call it.
I also agree if there are people here that are using sock puppets and aliases etc..and spamming or posting rudely etc.. they should be banned and I would hope that same standard would be applied on both sides of the discussion.
Not one Zoo member has ever provided evidence of a winning trade
Again, what is proof to you? It can't be a simple statement as I don't see how that proves to you that it was a Zoo trade.
Why hasn't even one ZOO member come on any forum and prove they can actually trade in their scalper fashion? Why don't you address some of the real issues? This is how the Zoo operates when they are caught " red handed" doing very unethical things.
I can only assume and I'm speaking for myself here it's because there really is NO way for anyone to prove what you're asking. As stated a number of times in this post. A simple statement showing profitable trading can't be enough as you have NO proof it was done with Zoo setups. So I am not sure how they can ever meet your criteria of proof.
How about finding someone ( including the instructor who doesn't actually trade) who actually trades the calls and can prove it with statements... 3- 6 months minimum
I have said I would send you those statements if you think that somehow proves anything to you. Again I repeat, how is that proof of the method in question?
....don't fall for the old trick where the vendor tells you it's against CFTC regulations
Actually if you did check you would see the CFTC very clearly states if you are using statements as an enticement to sell somebody where you receive a commission or finders fee those statements must be audited. So there is some grey area there. I agree too many vendors use it as a crutch to not provide any type of track record for what they do.
For now I'll keep my focus on how we caught the ZOO doing what they do best....lying!!! You can keep spamming!!
Well I've not lied. I've not spammed, I am not promoting anything and I have made a sincere and serious offer to try to determine what it is that would provide you with proof.
I have a hard time understanding what you would accept. If I send them to you and you say ok now prove it was zoo methods, how do I do that? If send them to you and you say ok that is profitable but you're one out of how many... I think you see my point.
I just don't know that there will ever be a way for you to be satisfied.. not that it's a bad thing but I think you can see from the other side of the coin how it's very much a catch 22.
Also for the record anyone posting with aliases or multiple personalities etc, have clear mental problems and I wouldn't trust a word they said on any subject.
